My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-07-19_REVISION - M2000158
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000158
>
2004-07-19_REVISION - M2000158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:51:53 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:15:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/19/2004
Doc Name
Ltrs. of Objection
From
DMG
To
Platte Sand & Gravel LLC
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the ~e Farm ~ <br />~~ <br />11419 Weld Couob Road 36 <br />Pletleville, Colorado 80631 <br />Phone (970j 783b061 <br />F.aaO: rpf11419~a rs.mm <br />mly 13, 2004 <br />Ms. Erica Crosby <br />Divisor of Minerals and Geology <br />Mined Lend ltelcamatlon Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, Suite 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Ms. Crosby, <br />RECEIVED <br />JUL i ~ 2004 <br />Division et Minerals and Geology <br />Greetings once again. I sincerely wish that there would not be a need for this letter of opposition. However, I have <br />received notice the Platte Sand & Gravel= LLC has aQptied for an amendment to their M.L.RB. Permit #2000-158. '~ <br />Specifically, Platte Sand 6t Gravel, LLC has requested m amendment to their origins! permit that would allow for <br />them to change the'v operation from a wet mining project to a dry mining project. This proposed amendment has <br />serious ramifications for those of us who are immediate, geographical neighbors of this property, and I must <br />respectfully request that the Mined Land Reclamation 8oerd deny this proposed amendment to the ariginai permit. <br />My reglrest for denial of this amaldment is based on the following concerns that ere not clearly addressed in the <br />proposed amendment: <br />• The paeotiel impacts from dry mining operations to adjacent landowners, domestic wells, 'urigation wells, <br />irrigation ditches and alluvial groundwater use subirrigation. <br />• The amended reclamation plan with rasped to environmelrtal protection of sur~ce wather run-on, runo$ <br />discharge, and goals and exportations. <br />• The preserrx of wetlands that necessitate mitigation and need fora 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers. <br />• The potential loss of wildlife habitat acct delineation of buffer zones to protect the bald eagle winter roost <br />habitat identified by the Colorado Division of Wildlife in 2001. Please reference Division of Wildlife <br />environmental speaalist Mgte Sherman's original reports m this application. These may require significant <br />revision for a proposed dry mining Ilptaafion. <br />• A carefid, prudent review of the l00 year goad plain analysis, mitigation and set back requirements for a dry <br />mining operation. <br />• An appropriate water augurentatien plan from the reclaiaed Take surface and water utilized in theday-today <br />operation of a dry mine. <br />• The containment and disposal for mine and plant generated chemical erect abet mining by-products. <br />• The appropriate lining of reclaimed pits for the proposed use of such pits glr municipal water storage. <br />• The legal right to enter end protection of existing struchlres and easements. Specifically, the praedion of the <br />Ft. Saint Vrain historical site. The Fort's original site is not marked by the existing monument The origins! <br />site can be determined only by trained, professional archeologists who can precisely determine the original site <br />of the Fort and can recanmend the appropriate preservation measures required to maintain the historical <br />integrity ofthe site. <br />• The legs! rite to enter with respect to future exptaration acct development of oi! artd gas leases. <br />• The question of appropriate radrarge structure and test wells to maintain the integrity of the amendment's <br />proposed slurry walls for praection of groundwater supplies. <br />I request status es a `party" to this amendment application <br />Sincerely, ep~ <br />Btuce lZppa~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.