My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-01-07_REVISION - M1992066
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1992066
>
2003-01-07_REVISION - M1992066
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:13:57 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 4:22:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992066
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/7/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Comments
From
DMG
To
Duckels Construction Inc
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OF <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />January 7, 2002 <br />Mr. Fred A. Duckels <br />Duckels Construction, Inc. <br />3500 Duckels Court <br />Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 <br />RE: Adequacy Review Comments -Hogue River Pit, 112 Amendment Application <br />Class: Revision,.Type-Seq.: AM-1, Permit No. M-1992-006 <br />Dear Mr. Duckels: <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFE7Y <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cottony <br />Acing Division Director <br />Listed below aze adequacy review comments on the above-captioned Regular 112 Amendment <br />application. The decision date for your application is scheduled for February 24, 2003. <br />Therefore, I would appreciate a response from you on or before February 14, 2003..(Please be <br />sure to include two (2) copies of your response). Please be advised that your conversion <br />application may be deemed inadequate and may be denied on February 24, 2003 unless the <br />following adequacy review items aze addressed to the satisfaction of the Division. <br />6.4.4 EXHIBIT D -Mining Plan <br />1. The Mining Plan Map -Sheet 4 of 4 (Floodway/Floodplain Delineation) shows 3100 linear <br />feet of flood control berm along the southern and western permit boundazies. The berm will be <br />at least 1$-24" in height and will have a minimum top width of 10'. The Existing Conditions <br />Map does not show such a flood control berm. The Reclamation Plan Map, Exhibit F also does <br />not show this berm. The Division requests that you clazify the timing of installation of this berm, <br />the volume of materials needed and cost for construction of this berm, and timing for removal of <br />the berm. Please respond. <br />2. The applicant specifies that small water impoundments maybe used for wetlands construction. <br />The applicant has also provided a wetlands delineation report which verifies the presence of <br />approximately 0.72 acres. Review of the Mine Plan Maps indicates that some existing wetland <br />areas will be eliminated during future mining. The Reclamation Plan Map, Exhibit F shows at <br />least four (4) flat wetland aeeas. Please clarify how these wetland areas will be established, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.