2006-08-29_REVISION - M1979165

• Permit No: M1979165
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 8/29/2006
• Doc Name: Request
• From: Albert Frei & Sons Inc.
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: TR2
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

~~ .
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF ADAMS
z ~1~1~111~1111~11~1111~118~1~1~9~~1~
e73esrzees as_o7:asan s.aa
Carol Snyder,tlerk S.OB
At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Adams County, Colorado,
held at the Administration Building in Brighton, Colorado on the 27`" day of June, 2005 there were
present:
Larry ~i'. Pace Chairman
Alice J. Nichol Commtssioner
W-R. "Skip" Fischer Commissioner
Tames D. Robhrson County Attorney
Kristen Hood, peputy perk o! the Board

when the folloa~ng proceedings, amoag others were held and done, to-wit:
ZONING AF,ARING DECISION -CASE #PUD2005-00006
PDI TRACT PiID 2nD AMENDMENT
WfiEIZEAS, on the 27`s day of June, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners, held a public
hearing on the application of Albert Frei & Sons, Case ItPIJD2005-00006; and,
WHEREAS, this cast involved an application for: Major Amendment to the PUD to eliminate
time limits and permit permanent concrete, asphalt, and recycling plants on the following
described property:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: P.D.I. TRACT -FIRST AMENDED A RESUBDIVISION
OF P.ll_L 1RACT -PLANNED iJNI'F DEVELOPMENT, A PART OF THE S.E. %.
SECTION 39, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
COiJN'I'Y OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO.
APPRO}OMATE LOCATION: 7281 Colorado Blvd.
WHEREAS, substantial testimony was presented by members of the public and the applicant;
and,
WFIF.RF,AS, the Adams County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 28~ day of
Aprii, 2005, and forwarded a recommendation of APPROVAL to the Boazd of County
Conmussioners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11' RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners, County of
Adams, State of Colorado, that based upon the evidence presented at the hearing and the
recommendations of the Department of Planning and Development and the Planning
Commission, the application in this case be hereby APPROVED based upon the following
findings of fact:
Findings of Fact:
1. The Amendment conforms to the PUD-R ar PUD-C standards.
2. The Amendment is consistent with the previously approved YUD for the property.
3. The Amendment does not result in a change in the character of the development.