Laserfiche WebLink
Middle Creek) and 1005 (Trout Creek neaz Orten Ranch, below Fish Creek confluence, copies <br />attached for reference) indicate a minor increase in EC and TDS values for Foidel Creek, but no <br />• significant variance for Trout Creek, following the dischazge, with all values remaining within the <br />range of recent historical variance.. TSS values for Foidel Creek spiked at the time of the dischazge <br />to approximately 18mg/1, but by the second sampling (approximately one week later) had returned <br />to normal historical levels (approximately 5 to 7 mg/1). No significant change in TSS values was <br />noted for Trout Creek. <br />Sten 6c: Contain the coal fines discharge (10/03/061 <br />The coal fines discharge was contained on 09/11/06 by the actions previously described for Steps <br />1 and 3. Abated 09!13/06. <br />Step 6d: Assess the notential toxicity imaacts, including the documentation of the chemical <br />constituency of the discharged material, to Foidel Creek and Trout Creek (10/03/061 <br />The dischazge consisted solely of coal fines, water, and a flocculant. Neither the coal fines nor <br />water present any potential toxicity concerns. Potential toxicity of the flocculant was assessed <br />on 09/11/06 and 09/12/06 through review of the MSDS sheet for the flocculant used, and <br />through contacts with the flocculant manufacturer re: any potential aquatic toxicity (copies <br />of documentation provided to CDRMS and attached for reference). Potential aquatic toxicity was <br />also quantitatively assessed in the field by a CDOW Representative, who conducted spot <br />shocking surveys and visual observations of Foidel Creek above, at, and below the point of <br />discharge on 09/14/06. Fish and aquatics organisms were observed above the discharge point and <br />below the identified limit of coal fines migration. It is assumed that some dischazge-related <br />mortality of fish and aquatic species occurred within the Foidel Creek stream segment directly <br />• affected by coal fines deposition, due to deposition and elevated sediment levels. Abated <br />10/03/06. <br />Step 6e: Provide an estimate of the total slurry (water nlus solids volume) discharged to <br />Foidel Creek (10/13/061 <br />The Thickener underflow line flows intermittently, but probably averages 80gpm of coal fines <br />slurry. Stream sampling was conducted on 09/06/06, and at that time, there was no evidence of <br />coal fines dischazge, so the maximum time period over which coal fines discharge could have <br />occurred is approximately 5 days (mid-day 09/06/06 through mid-day 09/11/06). Based on this <br />information, the maximum volume of coal fines slurry that could have discharged to Pond E is: <br />80 gpm x 60 m/hr x 24 hr/day x 5 days = 576,000 gallons or 1.8 acre-ft <br />The design sediment storage capacity for Pond E is 2.0 acre-ft and, based on recent cleaning and <br />observations, sediment accumulations (primarily neaz the pond inlet) had filled approximately 1/3 <br />(0.66 acre-ft) of the available storage capacity. Subtracting the remaining available sediment <br />storage capacity (2.0 acre-ft - 0.66 acre-ft = 1.34 acre-ft) from the calculated discharge volume to <br />Pond E (1.8 acre-ft), results in an estimated coal slurry discharge to Foidel Creek of <br />approximately 0.46 acre-ft or 20,000 ft't or 740 cy. Given that the coal fines slurry is <br />approximately 25 percent solids, the coal fines solids volume discharged to, and potentially <br />deposited, in Foidel Creek is estimated at 185 cy. <br />• Step 6f: Submit a written reuort of this information to the Division (10/13/06) <br />The reporting requirements for Abatement Step 6f were addressed by submittal of an <br />Abatement Report on 10/13/06. <br />NOV CV-2006-006 Abatement Report 6 2/7/2007 <br />