My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-02-11_REVISION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
1997-02-11_REVISION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2021 6:07:22 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:33:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/11/1997
Doc Name
Procedural memo Bonding for Water Treatment
From
DMG
To
Climax Molybdenum Company
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
._ <br /> <br />Procedural Memo - Henderson -3- February 6, 1997 <br />3. The reclamation plan for the Henderson Mine surface facilities is <br />completed, not including vegetation monitoring and fertilization. <br />4. The reclamation plan for the Henderson Mine surface facilities is <br />completed, including vegetation monitoring and fertilization. <br />5. The reclamation plan for the Henderson Mine and Mill surface <br />facilities is completed, not including vegetation monitoring and <br />fertilization. <br />6. The reclamation plan for the Henderson Mine and Mill surface <br />facilities is completed, including vegetation monitoring and <br />fertilization. <br />7. A release issued by the Water Quality Control Commission waiving <br />the requirement for the Division and the Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board to meet the requirements of the discharge permit during <br />reclamation, or reclamation, fertilization and vegetation <br />monitoring. <br />Summary and Conclusion <br />The purpose and goal of TR-006 is to establish a bond fund sufficient <br />to pay the cost of necessary water treatment to protect water quality <br />until that point in time when one of the situations listed above <br />occurs. The question to be resolved is which of the listed situations <br />should be used in determining the amount of bond to be required, and <br />are there other situations that should be considered that have not been <br />listed above? Item no. 2 from the list can be eliminated from <br />consideration at the outset because there is insufficient information <br />available to properly evaluate the situation. The other listed <br />situations need to be given due consideration, as do any other <br />scenarios that may come up during discussions, and both the Division <br />and CMC can select a preferred end point to be used in determining the <br />bond amount to be required for water treatment. Hopefully the <br />selections of CMC and the Division will concur. The various <br />alternatives, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each, <br />along with the preferred or recommended alternatives of the Division <br />and CMC can be presented to the Mined Land Reclamation Board for a <br />final determination. The following concerns need to be resolved as <br />part of the consideration of this matter: <br />1. A cost for design and installation of a haulage tunnel plug needs <br />to be determined. It is not necessary at his time to make the <br />effort to come up with a rigorous plug design just to facilitate <br />cost estimating, however, a conceptual design needs to be <br />developed (in terms of plug length, reinforcement, etc.) to allow <br />sufficient detail in the cost estimating. <br />2. Does the haulage tunnel ventilation shaft also need to be plugged? <br />The vent shaft would be the lowest elevation mine opening after <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.