My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-03-19_REVISION - M1983102 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1983102
>
2007-03-19_REVISION - M1983102 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:33:31 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:20:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983102
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/19/2007
Doc Name
Board Order Approval with Conditions over Objections
From
MLRB
To
Thompson Properties
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
table. The Applicant will use the existing well on the former Hahn property, now owned <br />by the Applicant, to monitor groundwater levels. The Hahn well is located down gradient <br />from the Spurlin well. Impacts to groundwater levels will thus be detected at the Hahn <br />well before impacting the Spurlin well. If groundwater is exposed, the Applicant will <br />cease mining in the area where groundwater has been encountered and the exposed <br />groundwater will be covered with two feet of cover. <br />~. In addition, the Applicant ageed to a condition, set forth below, that requires the <br />Applicant to install no less than three additional monitoring wells placed to protect <br />adjacent landowners. The groundwater monitoring plan will be submitted as a technical <br />revision. Data collected will be submitted quarterly to the Division. <br />10. To comply with existing Colorado water laws governing injuries to existing water rights, <br />the Applicant will delay the installation and use of a wash plant until water can be <br />obtained in accordance with Colorado water laws. <br />11. The Objectors claimed the Applicant violated existing Colorado water laws by exposing <br />groundwater in August 2006. The Division inspected the site and confirmed that <br />groundwater had been exposed, but noted that the Applicant had covered up the exposed <br />groundwater in compliance with a stipulation attached to the Applicant's existing permit. <br />In addition, the Office of the State Engineer reviewed the matter and determined that no <br />further action was warranted. <br />12. The Objectors stated that they were concerned about potential damage to water and <br />property through the use of magnesium chloride as a dust suppressant. The Applicant has <br />agreed to a condition, set forth below, that no dust suppression chemicals will be used on <br />site. <br />Thompson Properties <br />M-1983-102 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.