My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE36954
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE36954
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:07 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:19:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/25/1997
Doc Name
NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CIVIL PENALTY REQUEST FOR CONFERENCE
From
DMG
To
WEST ELK MINE
Violation No.
CV1997008
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nov c-9~-oos <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />This NOV was issued for failure to construct and maintain a road so as to minimize disturbance <br />to the hydrologic balance and, for failure to segregate topsoil from a disturbed area. Material <br />used to construct an earthen berm at the toe of a road was appazently in the channel of a flowing <br />stream during an inspection and, part of a silt fence at the toe of the embankment was non- <br />functional. <br />HISTORY <br />No NOV's have been issued at this site during the past twelve months. No penalty is assessed <br />for history. <br />SERIOUSNESS <br />Based on photographic evidence collected during [he DMG inspection, it appears that material <br />associated with road construction was located in the path of flowing water within Sylvester <br />Gulch. There is no quantitative data documenting the amount or extent of impact to the quality <br />of water in the stream. However, water quality in the stream was obviously affected to some <br />extent by the material in the path of the flowing water. It is not readily apparent that this impact <br />extended beyond the permit area. <br />in regard to segregation of topsoil, the operator has indicated that placement of subsoil berm <br />material on top of undisturbed topsoil is an accepted and approved practice in the West Elk <br />permit. If this is an approved and effective practice, in terms of reclamation, then loss of topsoil <br />is not being factored into consideration of the seriousness of the violation for purposes of this <br />proposed penalty assessment. This matter may need to be discussed further if an assessment <br />conference is held for this NOV. <br />Based on the impact to the quality of water resulting from deposition of earthen berm material in <br />the stream channel, $500 is assessed for moderate seriousness. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.