Laserfiche WebLink
1 The reason the 150 is picked is because the <br />• 2 180 days was picked for their other operation at last <br /> 3 month's meeting. Both permit applications are in, so they <br /> 4 will be able to meet this particular time, I think, even <br /> 5 considering the fact, the staff may end their interaction <br /> 6 and may put this off for a month, are would still have <br /> ~ a reasonable period of tine for them to yet their permit. <br /> $ On looking at Marge Ldinter's scale which <br /> y she made up, I went through that as well as the other <br /> 10 things the board might look at, it works out to 41 on her <br /> 11 scale which she considers to be a moderately severe <br /> 12 violation. Using my estimate and your ranges and, of <br />• 13 course, we can also go through the board's other guide- <br /> 14 lines, but I think 90 days of operation is most certainly <br /> 15 able to be documented and is indeed probably a conservative <br /> 16 estimate. I think before the board considers the penalty <br /> 17 itself, I know the operator does wish to talk to the <br /> 18 board. <br /> 19 That is really all I have to say. <br /> 20 THE CtIAIRDI7tN: h9ark, the question I have <br /> 21 again is you say the amount is $20,000 that you are <br /> 22 recommending for civil penalty? - <br /> Z3 MR. LOlE: With 10,000 suspended by the <br /> 24 board. I recommended this amount partly because last <br /> <br /> 25 month the board recommended for an operation half the size <br /> l:n et c c ~u+rl:x rcR ,e -~ssn~ ra re's. nc <br /> (null :1 Shorrhon,l Rrl •onrn <br /> !t(Ip Chr.n rJ/. RuuJ <br /> <br /> ;/~ i-0M1I ~5; N,i <br />4 <br />r <br />