My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-05-04_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-05-04_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 5:08:28 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:08:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/4/1992
Doc Name
CYANIDE DESTRUCTION THE INCO SO2 AIR PROCESS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CYANIDE POLLUTION CONTROL -THE INCO PROCESS <br />E.A. Dewyst & G. Robbins <br />A unique process for removing cyanide and base metal <br />complexes from industrial waste streams was patented by GJ, <br />Borberly et a1 (1984). The process uses SOz (liquid or gas, or <br />solutions of sulfite salts, or from burning elemental sulfur), plus <br />air that is dispersed in the effluent using a well agitated vessel <br />Acid produced in the oxidation reactions is neutralized <br />with lime at a controlled pH generally in the range 7 to 10. The <br />reaction requires the presence of soluble copper as a catalyst <br />which can be supplemented by copper sulfate if necessary. <br />The process can be applied to the detoxification of gold <br />and silver mining waste streams, such as carbon-in-pulp (CJP) <br />tailing pulps, barren solution bleeds, pond wader, and heap leach <br />rinse solutions and also to plating shops wastewaters. <br />The SO~/Arr process has substantial advantages over two <br />of the main alternative methods of cyanide destruction, namely <br />alkaline chlorination and hydrogen peroxide. <br />Alkaline chlorination is highly penalized in terms of <br />reagent consumption. Chlorine is a strong oxidant reacting with <br />species other than cyanide present in the effluent such as <br />thiocyanate and sulfides. Furthermore alkaline chlorination is <br />an incomplete detoxification process. Iron cyanide is not <br />removed and the potential for harmful by-products species exist. <br />Consequently final effluents may be subject to additional <br />treatment in order to comply with regulatory demands. <br />Hydrogen peroxide is selective for cyanide in solutions, <br />but is an extremely expensive reagent which, in many cases <br />decomposes rapidly in the presence of solids. This may lead to <br />high reagent consumpdonand/or incomplete cyanide destruction. <br />The Inco SO~/Air process is selective for total cyanide <br />detoxification, including iron cyanide which is removed as a <br />precipitate, uses safe, low-cost reagents. It is therefore, the most <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.