Laserfiche WebLink
(9oft deep) that was to be utilized for the disposal of coal <br />waste. However, in 1990 the pit had been filled in and the <br />material was beginning to be deposited above ground. It <br />currently has approximately 470,000 tons above ground (nearly <br />100 ft high). The State has informed the company that late <br />this year either the material will have to be removed and <br />placed in a permanent refuse disposal site, to be located to <br />the South-Southwest of the current pile, or the material will <br />have to be run through a preparation plant (yet to be built). <br />Explosives Area - Topsoil salvaged from this area is <br />vegetated. There had been a problem late last year with <br />erosion caused by a vehicle attempting to get down the hill <br />for water sampling of Pond T. The area has been regraded and <br />seeded. <br />Portal Area - Well maintained. The reclamation of this area, <br />in particular, the volume of material needed for backfilling <br />and grading is being addressed in the current review of PR-3. <br />The Albuquerque Field Office will monitor the outcome of that <br />review. <br />Near the conclusion of the inspection I requested Mr. Mills <br />make a few full time employees available for an interview <br />regarding the requirements of Sec. 703 of SMCRA and Sec. 865 <br />of the'30 CFR's. I interviewed the following employees: <br />Patrick Ring, Butch Krump and Jim Eggleston. <br />All employees appeared to be well versed in the MSHA• <br />-regulations deaiing with the reporting of obserired safety- --- ---- <br />violations. However, their knowledge of SMCRA and the <br />provisions for reporting, without the fear of retaliation, <br />environmental violations ranged from a vague concept to no <br />knowledge of SMCRA. In addition, when questioned as to whether <br />they had received a copy of the 30 CFR 865 regulations one <br />employee said he believed he had while the other two clearly <br />indicated they had not. <br />After the interview I requested Mr. Mills produce the material <br />that is normally given new employees and specifically what the <br />company believed it presented employees that met the <br />requirements of Sec. 865. Mr. Mills gave me a copy of the <br />Cyprus Minerals Environmental policy and a copy of an <br />instructional document outlining the activities of DMG and the <br />Division of Health. <br />While the documents presented by Mr. Mills indicate a positive <br />corporate attitude toward compliance with environmental laws <br />they do not constitute compliance with the specific <br />requirements of Sec. 865. Therefore, based on the above, <br />Notice of Violation (NOV) 94-020-250-001 was issued. The NOV <br />was served on and explained to Mr. Mills. He indicated that he <br />understood the nature of the violation and the actions <br />necessary to abate the NOV. <br />