Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a <br />• •~ IY. Entorcement Actions <br />1"'•The to11ox1ng toentlfles enforcement actions taken during this tnspeotton, the <br />required abatement•hnd date of abatement far the vioietton, previous violations <br />still requ(rtnp abatement and.the terminetian of violations cited during previous <br />'. inspections. <br />Notice of Violation INU1') C-93-112 was issued for failure to <br />properly notify surface land owners above underground'worlciags end <br />adjacent areas (4.20.2(1-3 )). The operator did notify Grand Mesa <br />Properties in .a letter dated December 13, 1984,, who at that time <br />owned three-qusrtera of Section 20. (Larry MeutaY;~s nox the <br />property oxnerl. Howover, the letter provided to Grand Hesa stated <br />that mining was to begin February 1, 1886; providing only three <br />booths no~.ification. The regulations require notification at least <br />six mon+th~ prior ~o m~ning.~,Thr„~etzt,¢r iiid specify the greaa in <br />which min ng ould 'tak pia a, b~t de~lec~(.etJ' informat$o1i reYa~•d11ng <br />' the dntea ot•mining activities that could cauaa subsidence sad <br />affect spociPic structures and the measures that would~be taken to <br />prevent or control .adverse surface effects. An .additional <br />landowner, the US Forest 6ervice, was not provided aa;rw~ptifioation <br />pursuant to the above referenced regulation..In order to abate the <br />violation, the company is required to prepare and send h letter to <br />all affected landowners who xere sot properly notified puravanE to <br />Rule 4.20.2(1-9).,Sufficient proof that the letter xas received by <br />''ti tt~e landowners should•he provided to the Division. The Division <br />would suggest that TCCC submit the latter to the A.ivision for <br />review, prlor.to sending it to the landowners. <br />NCtV C-93-113 was issued for fallus•e to submit proper permitting <br />documents prior to rclocating,topaoil piles. There were two <br />topsoil piles located on either sldo oP the Sylveste:• Oulch road <br />that .were moved eorotime Leat fall to the eastern elope oP the <br />refuse pile. Rule 4.08.3(2)(b) specifically states that <br />"stockpiled topsoil and other materials shall not be moved until <br />required for redistribution oa n regraded area unleea.approved by <br />"`' •.the Division". In addition, tt~e new location of these topsoil <br />pile8 hate not been located on the facilities map as .required by <br />Ru1o- 2.05.3(61. Cn order to abate the violation, tltie company is <br />requlcCed to p~oYide the•propnr µnd t(dequAte. permitting ,documents <br />pursuant to Rule 2.OS.3(51. <br />NOTE: Attach appropriate VIOLATIONS OR CESSATION ORDER COOING FORMS <br /> <br />Rsvisec: 4/88 <br />Doc. No. 8101E <br /> <br />