Laserfiche WebLink
June 25, 2001—LEI letter committing to submittal of additional bond by July 25, 2001 and committing to <br /> submittal of renewal PAR responses by August 15,2001,was received by the Division. <br /> August 20, 2001—LEI submitted two amended renewal application pages that had been requested in the <br /> PAR. <br /> October 17, 2001—LEI submitted responses to the Division's March 14, 2001 Renewal PAR letter, <br /> including amendments to the renewal application form information, and replacement application text, <br /> exhibits, and appendices. In accordance with Division request,the substantive responses were submitted as <br /> a technical revision application (TR-11). TR-11 was deemed complete on October 19, 2001, and a <br /> preliminary adequacy review letter(PAR)was sent to LEI on October 30,2001. The TR-1 I review entailed <br /> a number of additional operator response submittals and Division adequacy reviews. The Division <br /> ultimately issued a proposed approval decision on July 2,2002. The proposed decision was published in the <br /> Grand Junction Sentinel on July 18, 2002,and there were no objections. In addition to resolving the various <br /> concerns identified by the Division,the revision allowed for an increase in annual coal production from the <br /> previously approved level of 500,000 tons, to approximately 1.7 million tons per year. Maximum <br /> production level was subsequently revised to 600,000 tons per year, in association with TR-12. <br /> June 26,2003—SO-3 Permit Transfer application was submitted by LEI. The successor operator/permittee <br /> was Central Appalachia Mining, LLC, (CAM). The permit transfer became final on December 20, 2004. <br /> The Division was unable to issue a proposed decision to renew the permit to CAM until the permit transfer <br /> was approved. <br /> Applicant Violator System(AVS)checks were made on CAM on multiple occasions in association with the <br /> permit transfer and permit renewal, most recently on January 4, 2005. The OSM recommendation was <br /> "Issue". <br /> Publication of this proposed decision by the Division will initiate a thirty(30) day public comment period, <br /> after which the renewal decision becomes final,provided there are no objections. <br /> Description of the Fnvironment <br /> The McClane Canyon Mine is located approximately 20 miles north of Loma, Colorado, at an elevation of <br /> approximately 5,800 feet. Land use within the permit and adjacent areas is rangeland supporting both <br /> livestock grazing (cattle) and wildlife habitat. There is some irrigated agriculture in the East Salt Creek <br /> Valley adjacent to the permit area. Livestock grazing is generally confined to the lower lying canyon <br /> bottom lands. The steep canyon sideslopes and rugged uplands are primarily used by wildlife. Both mule <br /> deer and elk utilize habitat within and adjacent to the permit area in various seasons, and are the most <br /> common large mammals. Black bear and mountain lion also occur in the area, along with numerous smaller <br /> mammals, songbirds,raptors,mourning doves and chukar partridge. <br /> McClane Canyon is located in the Book Cliffs area just north of the Grand Valley. This area is northeast of <br /> the Gannesa Anticline and on the southern flank of the Piceance Basin. Local strata strike north-northwest <br /> and dip to the northeast into the Piceance Basin at between 2 and 3 degrees. <br /> The surface geology of the permit area is made up of the Mesa Verde Group of Upper Cretaceous Age, the <br /> Wasatch Formation of Lower Tertiary Age, and alluvium and colluvium of Quaternary Age. All local coal <br /> seams are in the Mount Garfield Formation of the Mesa Verde Group. The Mount Garfield Formation <br /> consists of fine grained to medium grained sandstones, gray shales, and coal bearing zones. The Sego <br /> Sandstone underlies the Mount Garfield Formation. Overlying the Mount Garfield Formation is the Hunter <br /> 6 <br />