My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-07-18_REVISION - M1981302
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1997-07-18_REVISION - M1981302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 4:31:18 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:39:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/18/1997
Doc Name
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION LEVEE AT DEEPE FARM PIT BOULDER COLO
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
&Ig <br /> Seepage Analysis <br /> The ground configuration necessary to create seepage instability must have <br /> the water level on the creek side above the ground surface on the land side. Also the <br /> water must remain high on the creek side long enough for the water to flow down- <br /> gradient through the soils from the creek side and the landside. Seepage analysis <br /> assuming a permeability of 100 for the foundation soils and a maximum head of 8 feet <br /> shows that a particle of water would take approximately 60 hours to move 1 foot <br /> through the foundation just below the levee. Since the time for most of the flood <br /> waterto pass is 20 hours, we conclude seepage is not a problem. The time frame is <br /> much too short to establish flow through the levee or foundation. <br /> Results of our pinhole tests for the levee fill and foundation soils show that the <br /> materials are rated as ND-1 or ND-2 and are non-dispersive. These results indicate <br /> that piping will not be a problem. <br /> Freeboard <br /> In our opinion the existing levee is densely compacted and has been in place <br /> long enough that consolidation of the levee and foundation due to the weight of the <br /> levee has occurred. The additional load imposed by the maximum proposed 2.4-foot <br /> raise of the levee will be small, less than 300 psf. This added load will cause <br /> negligible additional settlement of the levee and its foundation, therefore, loss of <br /> freeboard due to the proposed raise will be insignificant. <br /> LEVEE RAISE <br /> Two short sections of the levee crest need dressed to provide at least 3 feet <br /> of freeboard. The maximum thickness of new levee fill will be 2.4 feet. Soils similar <br /> to the soils from which the existing levee was constructed (see Figs. 8 and 10) can <br /> be used. The added fill should have 100 percent finer than 6 inches and it should be <br /> FLATIRONS COMPANY <br /> LEVEE AT DEEPE FARM PIT _ <br /> CTL?25,385 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.