Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes, August 26-21, 1992 <br />D RA P~f' <br />Subject To Board Approval <br />contents of the Order issued by the Board during that Meeting. It <br />included a request that the Attorney General investigate the situation <br />regarding the existence of Gold Hill Ventures and Gold Hill Ventures <br />Limited Partnership and provide an opinion and guidance to the Board <br />toward resolution of the problem of the placing of proper parties' <br />names on the permit and Board Orders. The Board had also stated that <br />if the operators satisfactorily completed all corrective actions in a <br />timely manner, including payment of civil penalties, the cease and <br />desist order could be dropped. <br />Staff said that since that time, the operators have completed the <br />corrective actions, including payment of civil penalties and, <br />therefore, the Division lifted the cease and desist order on August 19, <br />1992. The Division also retains a 55,000 reclamation bond. <br />Mr. frank Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, presented EXHIBIT B, a <br />report from the Secretary of State's office, and said that it indicated <br />that there was no record of Colorado corporations named MiVida <br />Enterprises, Inc., Cosmos Resources, Inc., or Gold Hill Mining Company, <br />Inc. being registered with this State. He explained that he was not <br />able to ascertain the identity of the actual permittees. However, Mr. <br />Johnson said the parties are working toward resolving this problem. He <br />briefly discussed the history of this case. <br />Mr. Frank Johnson recommended that the Board continue this matter in <br />order to allow time for a stipulation to be finalized that would permit <br />the site in the names of COM, Inc., and MiVida Enterprises, Inc. He <br />also requested that the Board provide authorization for the issuance of <br />a Reason to Believe Letter on its behalf, if the stipulation is not <br />finalized and permittees are not identified. In that instance, Mr. <br />Johnson Said the matter would be scheduled for a hearing for the <br />September 1992 Board Meeting for consideration of suspension or <br />revocation of the permit, to be effective until the operator(s) is <br />correctly identified. Mr. Johnson further requested that a Board <br />Member be designated to issue any subpoenas that might be required to <br />obtain all corporate documents reiated to this case. Board Member <br />McCannon volunteered for this responsibility. <br />Mr. Frank Johnson said that it is possible that Gold Hill Ventures and <br />Gold Hill Ventures Limited Partnership could be considered unregistered <br />trade names, and suggested that a record be established which would <br />allow the Board to hold the proper parties liable under the Board <br />Order. He said that for future administration of the permit, the <br />permittees) needs to be identified. <br />Mr. Clayton Johnson, an attorney representing COM, Inc., stipulated <br />that COM, Inc. is a co-permittee and that the parties are working <br />toward a resolution of the problems regarding this matter. Mr. Wayne <br />Tatman, with COM, Inc., and Mr. Mark Steen, representing the property <br />owner, MiVida Enterprises, Inc., were present. <br />