My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE34966
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE34966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:42 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:25:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/30/2006
Doc Name
Request for Conference
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DRMS
Violation No.
CV2006006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PQabody <br />Twentymile Coal Company 2sst s Roue county goad 1127 <br />Oak Creek, CO 80467 <br />970.879.3800 <br />Ms. Sandra L. Brown <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street -Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />(303) 866-3567 <br />Re: Twentymile Coal Company- Foidel Creek Mine (Permit No. C-82-056), Request for Conference on <br />NOV CV-2006-006 <br />Deaz Ms. Brown: <br />Consistent with our rights under C.R.S. 34-33-123(8), we are requesting a conference for the referenced <br />NOV. I have talked with Sandy Brown, as the Assessment Officer who signed the Notice of Proposed <br />Penalty, re: scheduling of the Assessment Conference, given that our current abatement schedule extends <br />through mid-December. <br />As part of the Assessment Conference, I anticipate requesting the CDRMS's consideration of a good-faith <br />adjustment of the proposed penalty, given our timely and diligent efforts to address each and every element <br />of the abatement plan. Timing of the Assessment Conference becomes an issue, in that my understanding is <br />that one of the criteria for approval of a good-faith adjustment is that the NOV be fully abated. <br />Consideration of a request for agood-faith adjustment during the Assessment Conference, with deferral of a <br />decision on that request and final assessment of the penalty until after the final abatement date, would be <br />acceptable. Otherwise, it appeazs that it may be appropriate to schedule the Assessment Conference after <br />the final abatement date. <br />In addition to the request for consideration of a good-fair adjustment of the proposed penalty, we would <br />like to discuss the basis and considerations for the NOV, relevant considerations with respect to possible <br />vacation of individual elements of the NOV (if appropriate), the proposed penalty assessment, and the <br />actions we have taken to abate the NOV. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation. <br />Best regards, <br />cc: Byron Walker/CDRMS <br />Dan Hernandez/CDRMS <br />Mike Berdine/TCC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.