Laserfiche WebLink
I~JSFECTIDN REF'OF,T <br />Mardi ~~~ "< ~1, 1994 <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Go <br />'~5.r-~BB F'oLltt County P,d #'?7 <br />Dal: Creel:, Colorado <br />Mine #t~ <br />Personnel Present During the Inspe~_tion: <br />Marcus Middleton: CYCC: <br />Claire Semmer: CYCC <br />F.i~.L: Mills: CYCC <br />Dave berry: Colorado Mined Land P..e~=lamatir_~n Division (CMLF.D? <br />Tim Stevens: C'LMF.'D <br />nary Frig : OSM/APO #C~4 <br />Weather and ~~round Conditions at the Mine DLrring the Inspection: two <br />tc~ throe feet of snow on mast ref the area witVi some clear spots on <br />westerly aspects; warm and sunny during the day with some snow melt <br />C~L'~=LIYYing <br />6E~IEF.:AL ~_ Ot1MENTS <br />This was a complete oversight ii <br />6i vision was nr~tified regarding <br />was able tc~ meet rr~e at tFie mine <br />identifii~;ation credentials were <br />inspe~.ti~..n. <br />ENFOF.:CEMENT ACTIONS <br />~spection. The Mined land P.eclamation <br />the schedule for the inspection and <br />to conduct it jointly. My <br />presented to the operator during the <br />Ten Day Notice CTDN7 #'a~~-~~~-'44-4 with two violations was issued to <br />the State of Colorado for vi alations noted during this inspection. <br />The first violation is written fc~r the operator's failure to certify <br />the ey:~=ess spoil dispcsal dump for stability and during the critir_al <br />construction periods. Inspections of the fill is to be conducted by <br />a registered prc~fessic,nal engineer r,r ntlier qualified professional <br />specialist at least on a quarterly basis and reports are to be <br />submitted tc, tFie MLFD within ~ wee4:s after each inspe~=tic~n. <br />The fill in question, was c~~mpleted in 1985. A%cording to company <br />officials, it is lgcated within the boundarys of a seeding plat that <br />is identified in a mine plan submittal as part of their reclamatir_m <br />band release request f~~r prase one bond releas=. Company officials <br />leave been asl::ed f~~r information regarding the disposal area in their <br />Adequa~.y review letter from the Division for tFieir renewal <br />application. The letter was sent to the company September 15, 1589, <br />wi tli the comment Lrnder F'EF'FOF:MANC:E STANDAF'D ISSUES aboLtt the permit <br />document not acidre=_sing the permanent overburden pile. It gees on to <br />Page 1 <br />