My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-02-04_REVISION - M1998014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1998014
>
2004-02-04_REVISION - M1998014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:47:45 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:23:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/4/2004
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Review response
From
TAL
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Feb-03-2064 OI:45pa Fran- T-TAB P.023/02a f-632 <br />District Court, Water Dlv. 3, Colorado <br />Case No. 02CW211; Ruling of the Referee aM Decree of the Coutt <br />Lafarge Went, Inc: <br />Page 21 of 23 <br />The Applicant shall install flow measuring devices at each of the Schmidt Gypsum Ranch <br />Springs described in paragraph 8 above in order to claim diversions under those water rights at <br />the Gypstun Ranch Eagle River Pump sad Gypsum Ranch Well. Applicant may only u~ertake <br />diversions under the original priority at the alternate points of diversion stated in paragraph 8 <br />above.when water is legally sad physically available at the original point of diversion. <br />The: change of water right for the Schmidt Gypsum Ranch Springs No. 5, 6, 7 and 8, as <br />more fully dexribed in paragraph 8 above, ie hereby approved, subject to retained jurisdiction <br />as provided herein. Such retairted jurisdiction shall extend to consideration of the implem~tation <br />of the change bf water rights but not to the historical tree of the changed rights. Farmer's <br />Reservoir & Irrigptron Co. v. Consolidated Mutual Water Co., 33 P.3d 799 (Coto. 2001). <br />16. Plan for Augtnentatlon Approved. The plea for augmentation described above is hereby <br />approved. <br />A. The proposed plan for turgntematioa meets the statutory criteria for a plan for <br />augmentation set forth in C.R.S. ¢ 37-92-103(9), -302(1) & (2), -305(3), (5) and (g) as one <br />contemplated by law. The augmenuation (substitute) water provided by the plan will be of a <br />quality and quantity so as to meet the requirements For which the water of senior appropriations <br />has normally bas used. If operated is accortltulce with the terms and conditions of this Ruling, <br />the use of water from the Gypsum Ranch Eagle River Pttmp, Gypsum Ranch Well and the <br />Schmidt Gypsum Ranch Spriggs No. S, 6, 7 and B will not injwiously afftct the owner of or <br />persons entided to use water under a vested water right or decreaf co~itional water right. <br />B. Applicant has provided the Court proof of its signed Water Sugply Contracts wilt <br />the River District for the amount of augmentation water required in the plea for augmentation <br />approved herein. To the extent mat exercise of the rights sought herein dcptu-da upon use of <br />storage water as an augmentation source by contract with the River District, such rights shall not <br />be exercised should that storage augmentation water not be available for Agpltcant's use. <br />C, Pursuant to C.R.S. ¢ 37-92-305(8), the State and Division Engineers shall curtail <br />all out-of-priority diversions under the augmentation plan, the depletions from which are not <br />t+eplaced so as to prevent injury to vested water rights. <br />17. Well Permits. A welt permit shall be issued by the Office of the State Engineer, Division <br />of Water Resources, for the Gypsum Ranch Well, pursuant to C.R.S. ¢ 37-90-137(2}, and the <br />plan for augmentation approved herein. <br />L1tODrICINeIgGFU~1{-GypumV~W hqua2CW3! I~Aalpg•PIH~4~p! <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.