My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-06-19_REVISION - M1999050
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1999050
>
2007-06-19_REVISION - M1999050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:08:27 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:20:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999050
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/19/2007
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Questions Response
From
Applegate Group, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Applegate <br />Group, t~~. ~~ <br />June 19, 2007 N~ <br />Ms. Erica Crosby <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />~~Z <br />e 5~-- <br />RE: Timnath Pi -1999-050 echnical Revision 02 Adequacy Review Questions <br />Response ~---- <br />Deaz Ms, Crosby: <br />This letter is in response to the adequacy review comments dated June 11, 2007. The two <br />comments aze addressed below. <br />1. There was a discrepancy between the approved mine plan map and the mine plan map <br />submitted with the TR request. The map submitted with the TR request is accurate. The <br />azea cuaently covered by the ponds was mined through as part of the mining plan. The <br />ponds were created as part of the reclamation. This is why they were only shown on the <br />reclamation plan map. <br />2. The original reclamation plan discussed a dewatering trench to be located along the <br />north edge of the site. As mining progressed it became apparent that the open trench <br />system for handling the groundwater was becoming a nuisance to the mining process. It <br />was determined that a French drain system could perform the same task and take up a <br />significantly smaller surface azea. <br />The open ditch that was functioning before replacing it with the French drain was at a <br />depth of 8 feet. Therefore the pipe would be buried approximately 8 feet deep. This <br />appears to be the level needed to intercept the water from entering the mining without <br />altering the ground water elevations. The installed pipe was 12-inch diameter A-2000 <br />perforated pipe with '/a inch diameter holes. The holes were aligned in pairs <br />approximately 30 degrees from invert space pairs 12-inch off center longitudinally. One <br />inch diameter gravel surrounded the pipe a minimum of 6 inches below the invert and a <br />minimum of 18 inches above the top of pipe to help filter the water into the perforated <br />pipe. MIItAFI Geotextile_ membrane was wrapped around the gravel pack. Native <br />material was then used to backfill above the constructed drain to bring the land to existing <br />grade. The native material consisted of fines and some cobles. A standard detail has <br />been included, The attached reclamation plan also shows the correct detail for the French <br />drain. <br />1499 West 120th Avenue, Suite 200 ~ (303) 452-6611 • Fax (303) 452-2759 <br />Denver, Coloratlo 8023a-2759 ~ www.applegategroup.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.