Laserfiche WebLink
• • 59 <br />1 cutoffs -- even those continue to expand? This is, <br />2 in our opinion, inappropriate, but that's simply a <br />3 comment. <br />4 C::AIP.MAN DANIELSON: Mr. Evans, Z <br />5 would say that the only reason I am recommending <br />6 this, as prehearing officer, is that there's; <br />T apparently some confusion principally on the• <br />8 applicant's part about what the four issues that we <br />9 want to hear are. And I would refer back to the <br />10 minutes of the May 31 -- is it May 31? May Board <br />li meeting -- at which Mr. Cooley's motion, I think, <br />22 very clearly stated the four issues and the only <br />13 reason I would agree with you, there's been .?lenty of <br />14 opportunity to do this. The only reason I are <br />15 recommending this is simply to bend over backwards to <br />16 make sure row that everybody knows exactly what those <br />1T four issues are. We're not expanding beyond them; <br />18 that if there's anything you have got ont there is <br />19 terms of a witness you want to list, or an exhibit <br />20 you want to put a copy of into the record, so the <br />21 other parties ca^. examine it, 10 days from today's <br />22 date will be your last opportunity to do so. <br />23 MS. NzVEL: Joyce Nevel for Mansfield <br />24 Development Company. Is the topic that was i:a your <br />25 second supilemental prehearing order, if I re:aember <br />MIDYrTT REPORTT_NC SERVIC° <br />(3C3J 424-2217 <br />