Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 permit. Of course, staff, if you removed, didn't <br />2 become part of the permit, would you lose a~a element <br />3 that was necessary to make the permit enfor=eable or <br />4 operable. <br />5 CHAIRMAN DANZELSON: In that case you <br />6 would add to recommend denial. <br />7 MR. BANTA: The division had beer. put <br />8 on the spot . We may have -- we would have :seriously <br />9 considered a recommendation of denial at theft point. <br />10 Further, I think the transcript shows that 1:he <br />11 company did not object to a con tinuan ce. Iri fact, my <br />12 reading -- again, this is my re ading of the <br />13 transcript -- indicated a conti nuance would not be <br />14 unacceptabl e, if I can use some sort of low ball <br />15 terms. <br />16 The other thing that I think shows in <br />17 the record; that, as far as the basis on which this <br />18 extension was done, unforeseen circumstances had to <br />19 do with the fact that there was late ir.forma.tion; <br />20 that Board members thought it was important thzt this <br />21 information be wade available. It was unforeseen in <br />22 the sense it came late. It was serious. It needed <br />23 to become a binding part of the permit; there ore, <br />24 the Board -- and I believe, I believe this, I czn't <br />25 find it right now -- I believe it was a unanimous <br />53 <br />M.IDYETT ornOR'1'ING SERVIC° <br />(303) 424-2217 <br />