Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 application. <br />2 And I guess as supplement to that, it <br />3 is the position of the company that it is in <br />4 compliance with the New Jersey Zinc decision. All <br />5 information necessary to a determination of the <br />6 granting or denying of this application was within <br />T the hands of the staff and the Board before July 14, <br />8 1989, the deadline by which the 120 days ex:~ired. <br />9 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: All rigzt. I <br />10 would again, with indulgence of my co]leagues on the <br />11 Board, put this issue aside for a minute, then, <br />12 because it seems to be intimately related to this <br />13 question of the 120 days' limit, and ask, stir, you <br />14 know, I would say we have read the request i`or permit <br />15 -- the Board has read your request for permit <br />16 issuance and we certainly need not hear it, at <br />17 length, abort that. I suppose for the benei`it of the <br />1B general audience, there is a statute puttinc a <br />19 !20-day licit on the permit issuance. Mr. Dfussbaum <br />20 has raised one issue which is the question cf whether <br />21 the 120 says really begins to run when, in fact, the <br />22 importar_t parts of the permit weren't submitted until <br />23 later after the initial filing. I thick, from the <br />24 Board's point of view, the clearer issue is that the <br />25 Board does have power u^der the statute in case cf <br />2s <br />MIDYETT RE°ORTING SERVICE <br />(303) 424-2217 <br />