ENFORCE34425 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6 • • 1992, 1993, and 1994 AHR Review Page 3 December 1, 1995 1994 Annual Hydrologic Report 1. Please make a note that an assessment of hydrologic impacts is required in the AHR. Please provide this for the 1995 AHR. In addition, the response provided in Mr. Stover's letter should be included in the 1994 AHR. Please provide a revised page. 2. BCC should provide a revised page to include the response in the AHR. 3. It appears that there is only a table showing water consumption and does not show how much water was imported to the mine. Please provide this information. General Recommendations and Questions 1. A map to be included with the 1993 AHR which shows the location of all the monitoring sites was included in the responses as requested. However, it was also requested that a map be provided to be included with the 1994 AHR which shows the location of the springs. This map was not included with the responses. Please provide. 2. BCC should submit a revision to add the North Fork upper and lower monitoring sites to the monitoring program. BCC should propose parameters that will be sampled and the frequency that these samples will be taken. The Division considers flow, pH, temperature, EC, TDS, TSS, Fe, and Mn appropriate parameters to be sampled. This information could be collected twice a year. 3. It appears that the Division's findings document is incorrect regarding the location of several domestic wells in the area. The Division will correct our document at the next permit renewal or permit revision. 4. BCC should submit a revision to include the completion diagrams for the alluvial wells. 5. As stated previously, BCC should provide revised pages for the AHRs which includes this information. 6. The Division will incorporate the revised table in the 1994 AHR.