Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1992, 1993, and 1994 AHR Review <br />December 1, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />french drain was installed prior to April 13, 1994, as the <br />text in the 1993 AHR notes a flow of 4 gpm on this day. The <br />french drain was installed four months before approval of the <br />repair plan and monitoring requirements. Please clarify the <br />date of installation. As the requirement to monitor the <br />french drain on a quarterly basis was approved on August 31, <br />monitoring should begin the next quarter, which is what <br />occurred. <br />As temperature is included in the field parameters presented <br />on page 2.04-30b as part of the monitoring requirements, a <br />revised page is not required. BCC should continue to follow <br />these requirements. <br />4. As the data is now available, BCC should correct the DMR <br />submitted for the second quarter of 1993. In addition, the <br />DMR should be corrected to note the 30-day average and the <br />daily maximum flows. <br />5. Please provide a revised page identifying the meaning of "nt" <br />and include the reason the water level was not taken. <br />6. The Division will add the table which presents the field <br />parameters collected for G-26A, G-26B, and CR-12 in the 1994 <br />AHR. <br />Quality Analysis and Predictions <br />1. No further response is required. <br />Report Content Requirements <br />1993 Annual Hydrologic Report <br />1. Please make a note that an assessment of hydrologic impacts is <br />required in the AHR. Please provide this for the 1995 AHR. <br />In addition, the response provided in Mr. Stover's letter <br />should be included in the 1993 AHR. Please provide a revised <br />page. <br />2. BCC should provide a revised page to include the response in <br />the AHR. <br />3. It appears that there is only a table showing water <br />consumption and does not show how much water was imported to <br />the mine. Please provide this information. <br />