Laserfiche WebLink
to provide additional technical assistance should the State so <br />request. <br />5. In response to your request for Mr. Rosenthal to respond to <br />questions raised in your July 13, 1995 letter, I refer you to <br />OSM's August 1, 1995 letter,•which responded to these issues <br />including the movement along the railroad tracks, the updated <br />resume for Mr. Rosenthal, and the Pendleton/Rosenthal discussion <br />about discontinuing monitoring over the 1 North workings. OSM <br />believes it responded adequatelytto questions directed to Mr. <br />Rosenthal. Since the State was the lead agency conducting <br />further technical investigation, all other issues were more <br />appropriately addressed to the DMG.'. <br />6. In response to your question regarding the Mincic Report, OSM <br />can find no written record in which we stated that the 1993 <br />Mincic Report was not any good. DMG used the most recent survey <br />to determine if subsidence has occurred in the 1 North Workings <br />comparing this survey with the baseline information. This was <br />fully explained in detail in OSM's August 1, 1995 letter. <br />Sincerely, <br />R~ Jv'Sei <br />Regional Director <br />Western Regional .Coordinating Center <br />cc: Susan McCannon, DMG <br />Acting Dir, AFO <br />Dir, DFD <br />