Laserfiche WebLink
50 <br />1 • • <br /> 1 that impounded water, to do the erosion control and <br /> 2 f <br />th <br />M <br />ti <br />b <br />k <br />h <br /> so <br />or <br />. <br />y ques <br />on <br />ac <br />to t <br />em simply was this: <br /> 3 If they felt they had the authority to go ahead and <br /> 4 do this activity as a normal maintenance operation, <br />t 5 th <br />h <br />did th <br />d t <br />h th <br />d <br />B <br />h <br /> en w <br />y <br />ey nee <br />o approac <br />e <br />-- t <br />oar <br />e <br />' 6 division for approval of the reclamation in order to <br /> 7 finish the job. <br />' 8 So I felt there was some <br /> <br />' 9 inconsistencies there. I thought there was <br /> 10 inconsistency with respect to what the original <br />' 11 application. was -- said was influence in the permit <br />' 12 area and what was submitted to the division with <br /> 13 regard to this amendment. And I felt there were <br />' 14 inconsistencies in the way they operated relative to <br /> <br />1 15 whether they had approval or not. Based on that, I <br /> 16 went forward znd gave them -- issued a reason- <br /> 17 to-.believ.e .that the.r.e,.was .violation..:ouY , ther,e.,,..:and..it <br />' 18 was for operations outside of the permit boundary, <br /> 19 and also for activities which had not been approved. <br />' 20 MR. O'CONNOR: What was t:ze relative <br />' 21 timing? Which came first? Their request for the <br /> 22 variance to do the remedial work there or the <br />' 23 initiation of the reason-to-believe of proceedings? <br />' 24 MR. BANTA: Their request to do the <br /> 25 remedial action czme first. Preceded th= <br /> <br /> MIDYETT REPORTING SERVICE <br />' (303) 424-2217 <br />