Laserfiche WebLink
I ` � <br /> feel that the wildlife values of the reservoir will serve as reasonable mitigation for the loss of <br /> these isolated habitats. If the area is reclaimed for some other purpose than water storage, we <br /> would need to know what the proposed land use would be to determine what if any mitigation <br /> might be reasonable. <br /> 57 Small Wetland/Tree/Grass Habitat at East Side of Property- We would prefer to see this <br /> area remain in place. If it must be removed for mining, we suggest that additional plantings be <br /> made in the various buffer zones previously mentioned. We can discuss specifics on this later <br /> if necessary. <br /> 6) Small Pond/Riparian Complex - As I understand it, no mining is proposed here, but the <br /> possibility is being explored of making a donation of this land for open space purposes. This <br /> might be a good idea and we will be happy to discuss it further if you like. <br /> Finally, I should comment that if water storage reservoirs are indeed selected as the end use, <br /> we would like to discuss the possibility of perhaps maintaining a fishery in them and allowing <br /> some public fishing opportunity. <br /> I hope these comments help scope out our concerns. Obviously, we probably will need to <br /> discuss lots of these ideas further. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Dave Weber <br /> Habitat Biologist <br /> cc: Kari Doerr, DWM <br /> Jim Satterfield, Fishery Biologist <br /> Darryl Todd, Asst. Reg. Mgr. <br /> Page 5, EXHIBIT H <br />