My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 12:52:42 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:43:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/15/1990
Doc Name
CONTINUATION OF TRANSCRIPT
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LJ <br />146 <br />1 MR. COHEN: It contains information that <br /> 2 the court rules seek. (Inaudible.] Zt's part of <br /> 3 that. <br /> 4 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Are those letters <br /> 5 addressed to you? <br />' 6 MR. MASSEY: On November 24th Z' received <br /> 7 a letter addressed to me from the Division of <br />' e wildlife with no attachment. That's the only <br /> 9 correspondence we have had during the amendment <br /> 10 rocess from the Division of Wildlife <br /> p <br />. <br />' it THE CHAIRMAN: So the question is, are <br /> 12 you asking the Board to accept the letter? <br /> 13 MR. COHEN: We are offering the first <br /> 14 letter with the attachment and the second letter, as <br />' 15 exhibits, yes. <br /> 16 THE CHAIRMAN: It's not part of the <br /> 17 record now? <br /> 18 MR. COHEN: It's not until the Board <br />1 19 it a <br />vid <br />t <br />W <br />ki <br />I <br /> accep <br />s <br />e are mar <br />ng <br />s e <br />ence, <br />presume. <br />' 20 it. I don't know if we need to mark exhibits for <br />' <br /> 21 purposes of the record or not. Maybe that wouldn <br />t <br />' 22 be a bad idea. <br /> 23 But the answer to your question is, yes, <br /> 24 we are offering it and we should mark that. And I <br /> 25 guess we would mark them as Objector's Exhibits 1 <br /> <br /> AGREN, BLANDO 6 BILLINGS <br />' <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.