Laserfiche WebLink
<br />145 <br /> 1 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Yes. <br /> 2 MR. COHEN: And the attached report. <br /> 3 Could we submit it as part of the record, maybe? <br /> 4 (Inaudible.) <br /> 5 MR. COHEN: We will make copies for you <br />' 6 afterwards. This is all we've got and I would like <br /> 7 to submit it. <br /> 8 MS. JACQUEZ: If I may update on that, <br /> 9 Neil, briefly, that the Division of wildlife was <br /> 10 contacted on th <br />i <br />i <br />l l <br />tt <br />th <br />t th <br />t <br />i <br /> e or <br />g <br />na <br />e <br />er <br />ey wro <br />a <br />e <br />n <br /> 11 November and they indicated that they had not made a <br /> 12 second site inspection, that they counted ors the <br /> 13 original impact statement, and simply sent t:he <br /> 14 letter in November of passing their concerns on to <br /> 15 MLRB. <br /> 16 The letter that was received yesterday <br /> 17 from the Division of Wildlife, is a clarification of <br /> 18 the November letter, where I think they do indicate <br /> 19 th <br />t th <br />i <br />i <br />t t <br />ildlif <br /> a <br />ere <br />s <br />mpac <br />o w <br />e. <br />' 20 Unfortunately, the Division of Wildlife <br /> 21 in this state is limited to making comments ,and <br /> 22 recommendations, which has absolutely no enfrorcement <br /> 23 power. But I think those two letters do ind:cate <br /> 24 impact, and certainly the impact report attached to <br /> 25 the early letter does indicate impact. <br /> <br /> AGREN, BLANDO 6 BILLINGS <br />' <br /> <br />