1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: M1988112
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 11/15/1990
• Doc Name: CONTINUATION OF TRANSCRIPT
• Type & Sequence: AM1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

' 134
i
i
i
?
1 th
s
nformat
on to
1 2 MR. FIFIELD: I think that would be
3 something that would have to be agreed upon by the
' 4 Town oP San Luis. I do not know if they have a city
5 engineer down there, for example. I do not know if
' 6 they have a director of public works.
7 Hut that would have to be something that
' B would have to be negotiated to where they could get
9 the maximum optimization, I should say, of tine data
h
i
i
h
i
i
10 t
at arr
ves
n t
r off
ce. So I am assuming -
e
11 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Not sending it to
12 the public as much as to someone either elected or
13 appointed?
14 MR. FIFIELD: Yes. I am not saying
15 publish it in the newspaper. Just so there :is a
16 responsible public official that can review ::t and
' 17 know what's happening.
18 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Do you bel:.eve

19 that the Mined Land and Reclamation Act or rules and
' 20 regulations suggest that we have that authority?
21 MR. FIFIELD: I do not believe ycou have
22 the authority at this time. I'll agree.
23 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: On the assurances
' 24 regarding the adequate and reliable supply of water,
25 do you represent that we have the authority to

AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS