Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />133 <br />1 particular system here and I have not done the <br /> 2 probability of it. And I would be very honest with <br /> 3 you, it's probably very, very low. i won't argue <br /> 4 that point at all. <br /> ' <br /> 5 But it still exists. It <br />s still there. <br />' 6 And I think we have to take account of this for the <br /> 7 safety of the Citizens of San Luis. <br />' 8 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: You mentioned <br /> 9 there were no leak detection systems that were <br /> 10 adequate for protecting the groundwater. <br /> 11 Would you suggest, as the last speaker <br />t 12 did <br />that we ou <br />ht to have a double-liner s <br />stem <br />nd <br /> , <br />g <br />y <br />a <br /> 13 similar leak detection system? <br /> l4 MR. FIFIELD: I think that would be a <br /> 15 very prudent way of doing it and my answer would <br /> 16 have to be yes, that it would be worth the expense <br />' 17 and time to protect the water quality. <br /> 18 I'm not an expert in the lining systems, <br /> 19 so that would be about the extent of my answer at <br /> 20 this particular time. <br /> 21 d <br />UNIDENTIFIED PERSON <br />Y <br />l <br />ti <br /> ou a <br />so men <br />one <br />: <br />' 22 that you would suggest that we have monthly <br /> 23 monitoring data that is available for the residents <br /> 24 of San Luis. <br /> 25 Who are you suggesting we would send <br /> <br /> AGREN, BLANDO b BILLINGS <br /> <br />1 <br />