1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: M1988112
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 11/15/1990
• Doc Name: CONTINUATION OF TRANSCRIPT
• Type & Sequence: AM1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

~ ~ 118
1 determine, as to his ranching in that area, of what
2 the canopy cover is and come with the impression
3 th
t if
t
i
a
we are ge
t
ng a 30 percent canopy cover,
4 we are doing good.
5 Well, if we had about a 30 percent
6 canopy cover, this would result in about a
7 130 percent error in your flows. I think this is
' 8 something that really needs to be looked at in a lot
9 more detail.
' 10 The probable maximum flood is another
11 detail that was mentioned here. The submittal
i
di
d t
h
i
i
i
i
12 n
cate
hat t
e probable max
mum prec
p
tat
on
' 13 would be 14 inches. In reviewing the document I
14 have in my hand, which is from the U.S. Department
' 15 of Commerce, titled Probable Maximum Precipitation
16 Estimates, United States, between the Continental
' 17 Divide and the 103rd Meridian -- these are cited in
18 the paper I handed to you -- the probable maximum
19 precipitation is not 14 inches, but closer to
20 19 inches.

21 As a result, the probable maximum flood
' 22 values can be anywhere from 48 percent to 72 percent
23 greater than what~s been identified in the submittal.
24 As I sat back there watching the
25 pzesentation by the applicant, I sort of chuckled to

AGREN, BLANDO 6 BILLINGS