My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32538
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32538
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:24:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/2/1991
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
COLORADO MINING ASSOCIATION
To
TMI
Violation No.
TD1991020244007TV1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
h1RY Uc' "?I I5~~1 COLORRLG MIFIII'16 A551~1 3[3 6949415 <br />P. 2%3 <br />May {2, 1991 <br />Mr. Robert H. Hagen, Director <br />Albuquerque Field Office <br />Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement <br />~ Suite 310 <br />625 Silver Avenue, SW <br />Albuquerque, NM 87102 REVIEW COPY <br />pear Mr. Hagen: <br />The Colorado Mining Association (CMA) has recently been informed t at the <br />i <br />Albuquerque Field Office (AFO) of the Office of Surface Mining Reclama ion and <br />Enforcement (OSM) may expect mine operators to maintain a copy of valid permits <br />and other records at a public facility in the county in which the ine is <br />located. <br />We believe it is appropriate to file copies of permit applications and r visions <br />at a local public facility during the pendency of such permit actions, but not <br />after the public comment period has elapsed and the permitting ac ion is <br />concluded. However, a letter could be filed advising an interested par y where <br />copies of such materials are available. <br />A requirement to maintain all such records after the permit action is c mpleted <br />is unnecessary and not mandated under Colorado's and OSM's regulatio s (cite <br />regulations here) for the following reasons: <br />1. Typically, the documents are filed with the county clerk, < <br />a public library or city hall might be viable alternativ <br />documents are generally voluminous and occupy substantial <br />Both the Moffat and Routt County (Colorado) Clerks have obj~ <br />holding these materials after the respective permitting ac <br />completed. Neither a coal operator, the state, or OSM has at <br />to require the local governments to hold such records. <br />though <br />The <br />space. <br />cted to <br />tion is <br />thorny <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.