Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' PAGE-BY-PAGE COMMENTS <br />I. Page I. Are there Monitor wells numbered M-3 or M-5? If so, tiv/iere are they? <br />RESPONSE: There were monitoring wells identified as M-3 and M-5; however, both <br />' monitoring wells have been abandoned since they were in the tailings facility <br />area. <br />' 2. Page 2. a. Exactly rv/tere is the smnpling point mentioned in item (2J (rap of _ <br />pageJ? <br />' RESPONSE: This sampling point is in the feeder ditch that runs from the ba9e of the tailings <br />facility to the collection pond. <br />' 3. Page 2. b. Where are the ltivo off-site wells (item (SJ, top of page)? <br />RESPONSE: The two off-site wells that are sampled as a condition in the decree in Case No. <br />89CW32 are the Dos Hermanos domestic well, which is located next to the Dos <br />Hermanos Ranch house, and the Sau Luis Water and Sanitation District No. 1, <br />which is located in the Town of San Luis. <br />' 4. Page 3. Item (5J (top of page) does not agree rvitlt item (IJ (bofto»t of page 2J. <br />Fur-hennore, considering drat the specific flow path of any leak from the tailings <br />t ponds !o the Rito Seco is no! known, other santplirtg points need tm be established. <br />Considering both these corrections and the need to establish more sampling <br />' points, Item (5) should read: <br />"(SJ Surface water monitoring systems (RS-/, RS-2, mtd <br />' RS-3J should continue to be monitored quarterly. <br />Surface water monitoring stations (RS-4, RS-5, RS-6 <br />and a crew station on the Rito Seco, west of dte <br />' tailings area, and in the flow pads of any potential <br />leak from the tailings areal, should 6e sampled bi- <br />weekly. <br />' "Ground water monitoring stations (D87-24, M-1 <br />and M-IIJ should continue to be monitored <br />' quarterly. Ground water ntonitorirtg stations (M-2, <br />M-4, M-6, M-7, M-8, M-9 and M-IOJ sbould be <br />examined bi-weekly, and sampled if snfJScient <br />' sample is available. <br />-7- <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />