Laserfiche WebLink
~LAFARG E <br />NORTH AMERICA <br />Construction Materials <br />the immediate vicinity of well number 2216, which has been identified as low risk for impact <br />during mining activities. Monitor wells DS03-MWOS and DS03-MW06 aze also located in the <br />immediate vicinity of well number 13697, which has been identified as high risk for impact <br />during mining activities. <br />Once again, because this is a long-term project, approximately 25 yeazs, Lafazge is maintaining <br />the position that wells located outside a current cone of depression from an existing dewatering <br />operation should not be required to be monitored more than quarterly. In addition, Lafazge <br />believes that the impact to the neighbors wells will be minimal, however, will accept the <br />responsibility of conducting monthly monitoring well readings in the vicinity of the active pit <br />azea that is conducting dewatering efforts that may impact an neazby well. <br />Lafazge has collected over 5 years of water level data for the project and believes that one yeaz of <br />monthly readings across the entire site prior to the star[ of mining on our first 40-acre pazcel will <br />not provide benefit to the project. Lafazge believes that baseline water levels have been <br />established utilizing our multitude of water level readings and requests consideration to the <br />condition stated above. <br />Lafazge proposes that the frequency of measurement should be increases if negative effects are <br />18. Section 3.2 of the "Groundwater Monitoring Ptan"proposes mitigation measures for <br />alleviating offsite ground water impacts, which include delivering water to affected <br />parry(s). It appears that changes of water rights may be necessary for implementation of <br />these mitigation measures. For water sources to be legally available when needed for <br />mitigation, they likely need to be included in the Substitute Water Supply Plan submitted <br />to the Office of the State Engineer. The applicant must ensure this mitigation water is <br />approved for those uses prior to dewatering. Given this information, the applicant must <br />demonstrate that the proposed mitigation plans could work. <br />The mitigation proposed in the "Groundwater Monitoring Plan" was recommended by the <br />Division during a previous permit application and has been successfully implemented in the past. <br />The OSE maintains jurisdiction over approved water uses and water will not be used for <br />mitigation purposes prior to OSE approval. If mitigation is required, the method of mitigation <br />will be agreed upon with the well owner and a temporary change of use, if necessary, will be <br />incorporated into our Substitute Water Supply Plan. <br />19. The Groundwater Elevation Graphs in Appendix B of the "Groundwater Monitoring <br />Plan" separate irrigation season and non-irrigation season groundwater elevations <br />versus date onto separate plots. How were irrigation versus non-irrigation seasons <br />determined? How will it be determined for future data collection? The Division would <br />ftnd the graphical presentation of these data more useful if the plots were overlaid as two <br />LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC. -Lafarge Aggregates, Concrete & Asphalt <br />10170 Church Ranch Way, Suite 200 Westminster, Colorado 80021 <br />Telephone: (303) 657-4000 Facsimile: (303) 657-4037 <br />