My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-10-19_REVISION - M1977247
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977247
>
2007-10-19_REVISION - M1977247
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:33:26 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977247
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/19/2007
Doc Name
Approval over objections of conditions
From
Reclamation Board
To
Georgia Pacific
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT-IB-O7 <br />10:53AN FROtI-RL <br />+303 566 5385 <br />T-042 P.004/010 <br />Permit from Fremont County, and any necessary Federal permits. (Rule 6.4.10, <br /> <br />B. <br />C. <br />D. <br />E. <br />F-971 <br />Exhibit M) _ <br />Has a description of the game and non-game wildlife resources on and in the <br />vicinity o£ the application area been provided? Have atl aspects of the mining and <br />reclamation plan taken into account the safety and protection of wildlife on the <br />mine site? (Rules 6.4.8 and 3.1.8) <br />Has the Applicant demonstrated pursuant to Subsection 6.5(4), Geotechnical <br />Stability Exhibit, that off site azeas will not be adversely affected by blasting <br />during mining or reclamation operations? (Rule 6.4.4(1) and 6.5(4)) <br />Is any part of the proposed miniztg operation, the reclamation program, or the <br />proposed future use contrary to the laws or regulations of 34-32.5, "Colorado <br />Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Construction Materials"? (§34-32.5- <br />115-(4)(c)) <br />Has the applicant adequately addressed how disturbances to the prevailing <br />hydrologic balance of the affected land and the surrounding azea and to the <br />quantity and quality of water in groundwater systems both during and after the <br />muting operation wilt be m;n;m;~~l? The specific concerns aze listed below. <br />(Rule 3.1.6 and §34-32.5-116(4)(h)) <br />i. Potential impacts to water wells in terms o£water quality, and to water <br />quantity from the proposed mining operations and from blasting vibrations; <br />ii. Potential water quality impacts from the release of toxins, including iron <br />gas, in the overburden and mined material; and <br />Botcitn~Coaldale, M-1977-247 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.