Laserfiche WebLink
10/29!2002 08:16 3036703522 TETRA TECH PAGE 03 <br />:, ,~ µ. ~' <br />The Applicant does not feel than vibration effects caused by truck tragic will be detectable at 100 <br />feet. If the Division is uncertain about the potential vibration effects, however, the Applicant will <br />commit to hiring a third party consultant to conduct a "pre•use" survey of the residence to <br />document existing oaoditions, to measuring vibration during typical operation, and to repairing <br />any vibration dama~ that occurs during the use of the access road. <br />The Hansons do own an easement, which allows access to their property over fire lot at 11061 E. <br />1 ZO'" Avenue (the Schibli property). The Hansons do not state that this easement is an exclusive <br />easement - erne thatwould allow exclusive use of the Land for the Hanson driveway. This <br />easement is most likely anon-exclusive easement that allows Mr. Schibli to use his land as he <br />desires, as long as thre is no interference with the Hanson's right. The Applicant will confnm <br />that this is anon-exclusive easement and will also commit to maintaining the Hanson's use. <br />As shown by the revised graphic of October l0 (submitted to the Division before the Hansons <br />composed their letter of objection), there will be a stop sign placed at the intersection of the <br />Hanson easement with the mine access road, The mine access road will also not likely require a <br />grade change at this location; but if a grade change is required, the Applicant will contour the <br />Hanson driveway at the intersection, so that the Hansons' driveway continues to be smooth and <br />functional. <br />Typically, an easement like the Hansons' easement cannot be terminated unless the Hansons give <br />it up. or unless the ssrrte person or entity comes to own both properties involved (the Hanson and <br />the Schibli ptoperin). In these circumstances, the Applicant understands that, to complete <br />improvements to 120°' Avenue, Adams Count will need to purchase the Schibli property; and in <br />Fact, Mr. Schibli, who is a member of the 124 Estates Partners, has begun negotiations with the <br />County to sell his lot at 11061 E. 120x" Avenue to the County. With the Hanson easement in <br />place, however, the County will not be able to use the Schibli tot, as it needs to. The County must <br />purchase both properties in order fA obtain the right-of--way needed for planned improvements to <br />120`h Avenue; and the Applicant expects that the Cou»ty will purchase the Hanson lot or initiate <br />condemnation proceedings to obtain it within the next yeaz. <br />At the southeast corner of the Schibli lot, there is a well that has historically been used for <br />irigation of several nearby properties. Only the Hansons continue to use this well by routing <br />water from it along 120w Avenue and then northward to their property. So that this use of well <br />water is not interrupted, the Applicant will place a 30 foot by 1 S inch culvert in the ditch along <br />1 ZO`s Avenue, wherethe ditch will cross the proposed access road. Another ditch leads from the <br />same well directly rorthward along the Schibli and Hanson property lines. Although it appears <br />that this ditch has net barn used for a long time, the Applicant will place a culvert at its <br />intersection with theproposed access road, if the Hansons do, in fact, also use this ditch. <br />The ,applicant assumes that the Hanson's septic system, including the leach field, is Located on <br />the Hanson property; which would place all components of the septic system at least 100 feet <br />from the proposed access road, According to the Tri-County Health Department, in a phone <br />conversation of Octalper 23, 2002, no damage to the leach field will occur, unless there is traffic <br />directly on top of it. <br />Regarding potential effects of the access road on livestock, the Applicant believes that domestic <br />animals show a strong tendency to adapt to noise, particularly low level background noise. Cattle <br />and sheep are comntmtly exposed to the noise of machinery of farming and feeding operations. <br />In these circumstances farm animals are already exposed to the noise of traffic from 120'a <br />Avenue, less than 200 feet to the south, and from Highway 85 and the railroad, which are 300 to <br />