My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-10-25_REVISION - M1986015 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2002-10-25_REVISION - M1986015 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:47:31 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:39:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/25/2002
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Transit Mix of Pueblo Inc
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Mark Heffner <br />May 31, 2002 <br />Page 4 <br />Ground Water Modeling Analysis <br />In order to estimate water level impacts to nearby wells, we developed a ground water flow model <br />using USGS MODFLOW. The model simulates the Arkansas River and boundary conditions at the <br />aquifer boundaries; and it was calibrated to the monitoring program water level data. The model <br />allows us to simulate various mining scenarios, including simulations with various levels of pit <br />dewatering and various mechanisms in place to mitigate the water level impacts. In general the <br />model shows that water level drawdowns are greatest very neaz the pit and decrease further from the <br />pit. The Arkansas River buffers many of the water level impacts; accordingly, drawdowns are <br />greatest near the pit and the northern boundary of the aquifer. Near the River, impacts aze minimal <br />to none due to the buffering effects of the River. <br />Our modeling analysis included a simulation of a worst case scenario in which the entire Phase 1 <br />area is dewatered with nothing in place to mitigate water level impacts. This simulation indicated <br />that during mining, water level impacts may be great enough in the Martin well to interrupt the <br />wells' ability to produce the pumping entitlement. Water level impacts to the Tilley well are not <br />expected to be great enough to impair the well's ability to produce its pumping entitlement. We note <br />that the possible interruption of service to the Martin well will be temporary and alternative water <br />supplies can be provided during the period of interruption. Alternative water supplies may include <br />hauling water, pumping water from the gravel pit to the well users for irrigation, or other water <br />supplies. <br />Upon completion of mining, a slurry wall will be installed along the perimeter of the pit to allow for <br />lined reservoir storage. This scenazio was also simulated in the model and indicated that water level <br />impacts following mining will be very minimal. There will be a slight bulge and shadow effect <br />above and below the pit, respectively, but the water level changes will not be enough to impair any <br />wells from pumping their entitlements. <br />Summary and Conclusions <br />Our findings indicate that there is potential for periods of interruption to nearby water supply wells, <br />but these periods of interruption will be temporary, and Transit Mix of Pueblo is prepared to provide <br />alternative water supplies during periods of interruption. The well most directly impacted by the <br />mining activities (Helmsing well) will be replaced or an alternative water supply provided. The <br />water level and water quality monitoring program will provide an early warning system if water <br />levels in nearby wells are adversely impacted. With the information provided from the monitoring <br />program, Transit Mix of Pueblo will be able to mitigate or minimize impacts before any wells or <br />well users aze adversely impacted. <br />i Bishop-Brogden Associates, lnc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.