Laserfiche WebLink
<br />S <br />1V. Entorcement Actions <br />•rf. .A.:••.. .~• , ~ <br />1"'The tollowing toentifles entorcement actions taken during this inspection. the <br />• required abatemen'i had date of abatement for the vioiatlon, previous violations <br />st111 requiring abatement and the terelnatlan of violations cited during previous <br />' inspections. .• <br /> <br />Notice of VSnlntion INU1') C-93-112 was issued Por foilure to <br />properly notify surface Innd owners above underground worlcings and <br />ad,)acent arena 14.20.2(1-3 )1. The operator did notify Grand Meaa <br />Properties in .a letter dated December 13, 19H4,• who at that time <br />owned throe-quarters of Section 20. (Larry MauteY;!i:^ now the <br />property ownerl. Howover, the letter provided to Grand Hesa stated <br />that mining was to bogin February 1, 1886; providing only three <br />'months notification. The regulations require notification nt least <br />si:c mon+th$ prior ~o mining ~ , Ths „),,et,t,~r did specify the areas in <br />xhich mini'ng r}ould 'taker plac''e, b~t degyleck.erl~ intormatl'o~ reifabd>?ng <br />the dntea of mining nttlvitiea that could cause subsldarnce and <br />affect apociPic ^tructuras and the measures that would•be taken to <br />prevent or control .adverse surface effects. An additional <br />landowner, the US Foreat•Service, was not provided at~rw~ptification <br />pursuant to the above referenced regulation. .In order to abate the <br />violation, the company !s required to prepare and send h letter to <br />all affected landowners who ware not properly notified pursuant to <br />Rule 4.20.2(1-9), Sufficient proof that the letter xas received by <br />Late laridownera should~be provided to the Division. The Dlviaion <br />would suggest that MCC submit the latter to the Division for <br />review, prior to sending it to the landowners. '. <br />NC1V C-83-113 was issued for failure to submit proper permitting <br />documents prior to relocating,topsoil piles. Thera were two <br />topsoil piles located on either side of the SylvesCe:•.Oulch road <br />that .we re moved aodetime last fall to the eastern elope oP the <br />refuse pile. Rule 4.08.3(2)(b1 apecifioally etatos that <br />"stockpiled topsoil and oth~r• materials shall not he m~~ved until <br />required for redistribution on n regraded area unless.approved by <br />'' •.the Dir'•ision". Iii addition, tt~e new location oP rheas topsoil <br />piles have not been located on the facilities mup as .required b}• <br />Rule ;.05.3(61. Cn ordet• to abate the violation, ilia company is <br />sequlsted to pi:o~ide the proper ,sad atdequAte. p.ermittijig ,documents <br />pursuant Lo Rule 2.OG.3(51. <br />NOTE: Attach appropriate YIOlATI0N5 OR CESSATIDN ORDER CODING FDRMS <br />Revises: 4/88 <br />Ooc. No. 8101E <br /> <br />