My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-25_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-25_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 10:54:03 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:19:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/25/1990
Doc Name
REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONTY OF PHILIP HOCKER
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> s <br />t <br /> 1 depending on whose ruler you use and, yet, if you <br /> 2 study the drawings, you will find the total linear <br />' 3 idt <br /> w <br />h at the top in the reclaimed configuration, <br /> <br /> 4 including the spillway, will be 2100 feer_ or the <br /> 5 length of seven football fields up on the hillside <br />' 6 there. <br /> 7 It will be skylined from certain angles <br /> 8 and it will be, even if their revegetaticon is as <br /> 9 successful as they propose, a major man-Wade <br /> 10 i <br />i <br /> mpos <br />tion on what is now a natural landscape on the <br /> 11 east side of the San Luis vicinity. <br /> 12 I believe that there should tie redesign <br />' 13 of this facility to blend it with the existing <br /> 14 landscape, so that the final reclamation will reduce <br /> 15 its visual impact. I think that this could be <br /> 16 accomplished. I believe that this redesign should <br /> <br /> 17 vary with the line and should not be simply a <br />1 18 straight line stretched across between the two <br /> 19 hillsides. It could vary both with plan, so there <br />' 20 would be swales and forward projecting areas in the <br /> 21 embankment, and, in addition, there is no reason <br /> 2 b <br />ft i <br />b <br />h <br />th <br />t <br />f it <br />d <br />t <br />l <br />l <br />t <br />l <br /> 2 s <br />o <br />e <br />w <br />y <br />e <br />op o <br />nee <br />e <br />n an .a <br />so <br />u <br />e <br />y <br />' 23 flat configuration. <br /> 24 I can understand from an engineering <br />' 25 point of view why they might be reluctant to do this <br />AGREN, BLANDO S BILLINGS <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.