Laserfiche WebLink
<br />evaluation report along with a permit revision (and bond increase, if required, pursuant to <br />abatement requirement N 10) if a modification of the reclamation plan was w#rranted. <br />BMRI submitted a reclamation evaluation review report in May, 1993. The Keport contained <br />static and kinetic test data from several drill holes located in the upper and Igwer portions of <br />the impoundment. BMRI concluded that the test data demonstrated conclusively that a change <br />in the chemical constituency of the tailings did not occur. <br />After reviewing the reclamation evaluation review report, and comments Erato several <br />concerned citizens (who also reviewed the report), the Division sent BMRI ~n adequacy letter <br />which outlined additional concerns. BMRI responded to the Division's adegtacy letter October <br />1, 1993. Except for test result data from three new drill holes (drilled in the railings <br />impoundment in September, 1993), BMRI adequately addressed all the Divi#ion's, and <br />concerned citizens', comments. <br />BMRI submitted test result data from the new drill holes on September 22, 11997. After <br />review, the Division concluded that a change in chemical constituency did opt occur in the <br />tailings impoundment as a result of the high cyanide concentrations so, therdfore, the <br />reclamation plan does not have to be modified. <br />9. Modification of environmental monitoring plan: Status; Completed. BMR[ stbmitted TR-06, <br />TR-08, TR-10, and TR-15. <br />10. Adjustment of financial warranty: Status; Satisfied. <br />11. Critical path project management schedule: Status; Satisfied. <br />l2. Modification of monitor sampling and analysis protocol: Status; Completed) BMRI submitted <br />TR-06. <br />Additional Board Ordered corrective action items from the June 25, 1992 hearing: <br />1. Initiate the additional ground water monitoring proposed in TR-08: Status; ompleted. <br />2. Use all reasonable practical steps to continue to lower cyanide levels in the failings pond to the <br />lowest reasonable achievable levels: Status; Completed. <br />Additional Board Ordered corrective action items from the July 22, 1992 hearing: <br />1. Maintain the WAD cyanide level below 15 ppm in the active tailings pond, and below 10 <br />ppm in the inactive tailings pond: Status; Completed. <br />2. BMRI shall implement the Inca process as soon as possible, and bring the tailings pond into <br />compliance as soon as possible thereafter: Status; Completed. <br />All the NOV abatement requirements have been completed so NOV M-92-026 should be abated. Should <br />we inform the Board that this violation has been corrected? <br />