Laserfiche WebLink
~. <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />Davitl H. Getches, Execulrve Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />January 14, 1986 <br />Mr. Vern Pfannenstiel <br />Peabody Coal Company <br />10375 East Harvard Avenue, Suite 400 <br />Denver, Colorado 80231 <br />Re: Response to NOV C-85-081, Seneca II Mine - File No. C-80-005 <br />Dear Vern: <br />I apo]ogize for the length of time it has taken me to respond to the above <br />referenced letter. I have several comments on the material presented; some we <br />have already discussed during telephone conversations and after the assessment <br />conference. <br />1. As we have discussed, the Wadge Impoundment is of sufficient size to hold <br />the 10 yr-24 hr storm and 110.6 at-ft of sediment. Peabody presented <br />calculations for an annual sedimentation rate of 10.2 ac-ft/yr but did not <br />exp]ain how this number was reached. Some explanation should be presented. <br />Using 10.2 ac-ft/year, since pond construction available storage has been <br />depleted by 54.4 ac-f t. The remaining storage will be depleted in 11.4 <br />years. While this is a few years away, I strongly recommend Peabody <br />re-evaluate their sediment yield calculations for this area to show that these <br />figures are conservative. This will eliminate the need for pond surveys in <br />the future to show that cleanout is or is not necessary. This can be done as <br />part of the 5 year permit renewal. <br />2. My calculations show a slight deviation from the ones presented by Peabody <br />for the shop area pond. Sediment levels for this pond do not require cleanout <br />at present, however, my calculations show 1.56 ac-ft of storage remaining <br />before the 60 percent level is reached. Please evaluate and correct if <br />necessary. Peabody may want to re-evaluate annual sediment yield calculations <br />for this pond also. <br />3. For the southeast pond my calculations again show a slight deviation from <br />Peabody's. Please evaluate and correct if necessary. The l0yr-24 hr storm <br />will most likely be passed without using the emergency spillway. Peabody <br />should do a flood routing to verify this. Sediment yield calculations may <br />also need revising. <br />4. Finally, Peabody proposes to implement a sediment level monitoring <br />schedule of every 3 years. Familiarity with the mine site requires the <br />Division to impose a monitoring schedule of once a year <br />423 Ceniennia! Building, 7313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />