Laserfiche WebLink
12ito/98 'rHC~ 18:1J Fa.Y • • foot <br />Discharges from a pond or refuse pile can easily be traced to their sourer. Thus, <br />even though tunoffmay be caused by rainfall or snow melt percolating ~hrough a <br />pond or refuse pile, the dischazge is from a point source because the por}d or pile <br />acts to collect and channel contaminated water. <br />Washington Wilderness Coalition et al v Hecla Minin Comoany, 870 F. Sup~983, 988 (E.D. <br />Wash. 1994) citin Trustees for Alaska v. FpA, 749 F.2d 549 (9th Cir. 1984)(0 er citations <br />omitted). <br />!n this case, since it is clear that the West Pit is hydrologically connecte to the Rito Seco, <br />releases from the Pit into the ground water that soon reach the stream are considered point source <br />discharges. As noted by EPA Region VIII: <br />We found some mines had seeps or other ground water dischazges to s ace water <br />which were not authorized in the faciliry's NPDES permit. There were so some <br />mines without an NPDES permit which had claimed to be "non-dischar 'ng". <br />However, upon inspection, these facilities were found to be discharging hrough <br />seeps and water control structures. These facilities are now being requt ed to <br />obtain NPDES permits covering all outfa/ls including ground water dis urges <br />determined to be hydrologically connected to surface water.... It is the ore, <br />EPA's position that seeps and other ground water discharges hydrologic ly <br />~ <br />connected to surface waters from Hynes, either active or abandoned, are lischazges <br />from point sources and are subject to regulation through NPDES permit. <br />Letter from Max Dodson, Director, Region VIR Water Management Division to Dan Fraser, Chief, <br />Montana Water Quality Bureau, Re: NPDES Permit Issues, !Yard Rock Mines, d red Dec. 22, 1993 <br />at p. 2 <br />In this case, BMRI has a "zero dischazge" storm water runoff permit that does not authorize <br />any discharges from the West Pit into the Rito Seco. As such, the discharge fro the West Pit into <br />the Rito Seco should be immediately investigated. Based on the information av '!able to date, it <br />appears that an unpermitted discharge has and is occurring. If your investigatio cottfums this. we <br />request that the Division utilize its full authority to take whatever actions are ne ssary to bring the <br />discharger into strict compliance with the law as soon as possible. Appropriate ivil penalties <br />and/or fines under the law may also be appropriate depending on the result of yo(tr investigation. <br />We look fornard to your response to these serious questions. Thank your <br />Attorney for the <br />e ltemative Energy Services <br />