Laserfiche WebLink
_. <br />POWDERHORN <br />COAL COMPANY <br />July 19, 1994 <br />Ms. Erica S. Crosby <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203-2273 <br />RE: N.O.V. C-94-014 <br />Dear Ms. Crosby: <br />iii iuiiiiiiiiii iii <br />sss <br />P.O. Box 1490 <br />Palisetle, COlOratlO 87526 <br />(309) 464-7951 <br />Fax (909) 464-7181 <br />RECFII.~F'4~ <br />JUL 2 51994 <br />L~fV'Si00 of P.1iIIBr~15 a c;r,~rooy. <br />Attached please find a certification for the installation of Pond 11. Excavation of the pond <br />and installation of rip-rap in the emergency spillway was completed on July 19, 1994. As <br />discussed during your inspection, I am submitting additional information that I believe is <br />pertinent to the subject N.O.V. <br />The primary issue is the adequacy of sediment control. Our initial intention was to <br />excavate the pond and haul the dirt away as borrow material. However, the extreme <br />volume of rock encountered at the pond location jeopardized the completion schedule for <br />the pile cover. Therefore, excavation of the pond was suspended when we believed that <br />we had met the absolute sediment control volume requirements for the short term <br />completion of the cover project. These requirements relate to the facts that the design <br />3 year sediment capacity would not be absolutely necessary during the 3 to 4 week delay <br />in construction and the total design runoff capacity would not be absolutely necessary <br />because less than 4 acres of the design 8.6 acre disturbance had been disturbed. <br />The primary spillway was not an issue for this temporary condition because the pond was <br />designed for pumped discharge. Installation of the emergency spillway was complicated <br />by the need to develop the adjacent drainage channel. This will be discussed further in <br />the following paragraphs. By not having the emergency spillway excavated, the effective <br />capacity of the pond was greatly increased. I estimated that the increased capacity below <br />a 1 foot freeboard was approximately 0.3 acre-feet or 75 percent of the actual design <br />runoff capacity of the pond. Considering absolute capacity requirements, I believe that <br />we would have contained at least a 25 year event. <br />The second issue relates to the time pressure that we were under to complete the pile <br />cover. O.S.M. Closure Order No. 94-020-370-001 (effective 6/29/94) allowed 30 days for <br />completion with stiff daily penalties to terminate the pile cover violation before more <br />drastic measures were taken against our operation. We felt obligated to meet the 30 day <br />