Laserfiche WebLink
Topper Otry'ectioa <br />Amendment No.l - Jeronimus Property <br />Permit # M-99-034 <br />lakes are partially dewatered, this will lower the water table in the surrounding alluvial aquifer. A <br />lowered water table reduces the efficiency of my well's production and increases my pumping costs. <br />If water levels in the cakes are reduced significantly, the resuhing water level decline in the <br />surrounding aquifer may be such that my well would go dry when pumped. A decline of the natural <br />water table produced by actions of the applicant would resuh in injury to my decreed water right in <br />the irrigation well and the other exempt alluvial well. The applicant provides no hydrologic <br />assessment ofthe potential impact to surrounding structures from dewatering oftbe pit Takes. <br />In paragraph 4 of the mining notes and restrictions of Exhibit C-2 it is stated "Topsoil and <br />overburden stockpiles that are temporarily stored on site..., have a maximum height of 30',..." Item <br />#6 on page 3 of Exhibit D of the permit application also addresses topsoil and overburden excavation <br />and stockpiling. In this item, stockpiles are cited to be a maximum of 20' in height. Cleazly, there is <br />a 10-foot discrepancy between these two documents. The height of stockpiles will influence their <br />runoff and erosion, slope stabilhy, airborne particulate generation, and creation of visual <br />obstructions.- Interested patties-cannot articulate-objections So a mining plan when that.plan.contains. <br />factual inconsistencies. <br />My concerns regazding water quality include remobili7ation of existing contaminants, herbicide <br />application, vehicular/equipment spills, and inadequate permit compliance. The Henderson area of <br />Adams County is within a ground water contaminant plume attributed to historical waste disposal <br />practices at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal The arsenal, established in 1942, was orn of the U.S. <br />Army's last chemical weapons rnanu&icturing facilities to be built during World War II. The major <br />types of wntaminants at the arsenal include pesticides, solvents, metals, and pesticide and chemical <br />munitions breakdown products. According to the Tri-County Health Department, arsenal related <br />contamination can be found both onpos[ and offpost. The majority of otfpost contamination is found <br />in the shallow, unconfined aquifer. In the mid to late 1980x, an offsite contamination assessment <br />was conducted and the Henderson area, among others, was identified as containing high levels of <br />diisopmpylmethylphosphonate (DIMP), a chemical unique to the Army's manufacture of GB nerve <br />gas, or sarin. In response to the findings of this investigation, the Water Quality Cotttrol Division of <br />the State of Colorado established a Colorado ground water standard of 8 µg/L for DIMP. This class <br />ofsemi-volatile organic compounds, though somewhat soluble, tends to adsorb on soil particles. <br />Given the known contaminant plume in this area, excavation activities associated with removal of <br />aggregate materials within the zone of water table fluctuation will remobilize contaminants that had <br />adsorbed on the subsurface alluvial materials. This remobilization can produce an immediate threat <br />to human health by ingestion ofcontaminated drinking water supplies. Potemial heahh impacts <br />associated with remobilization of known comaminants in this area have not been addressed by the <br />applicant. <br />While the applicants permit documentation mentions the existence of a Storm Water Management <br />Plan and permit in addition to a Spill Prevention Control Plan, these existing plans have not been <br />modified to reflect the addition of the Jeronimus Property or proposed mining plan thereon. The <br />mining plan, Exhibit D, indicates that piping will be installed to convey wash water back to the lake <br />areas from the Plant Site. Such a structure constitutes a point discharge to ground water and would <br />require issuance of a discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division. Such a point <br />discharge may further concentrate existing contaminants dissolved in the ground water. The <br />applicant has not demonstrated the issuance or application for a Colorado Wastewater Discharge <br />Permit for this property. <br />