Laserfiche WebLink
' ~ Karen Topper <br />~~ 8120 E.104`a Avenue <br />Henderson, CO 80640 <br />(303) 838-5636 <br />Apri13, 2003 <br />i,r~ <br />RECE~`!~D <br />AP;3 4 a:~3 <br />Division at Minerals and Geology <br />~ Division of Minerals and Geology <br />!~~ • 313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />/Denver, CO 80203 t~6/ (~% ~'' <br />Attn. Reclamation Permit Application Manager v ~ ~ ` ©/ / <br />RE: '~ggregate Industries - WRC, Inc. ,/ <br />t/ Cooley Reservoir and Fulton Wildlife Area Amendment No. l - Jeronimus Property <br />Amendment to Permit No. M-99-034 <br />Dear Sirs: <br />I would like to be placed on record as an objector to Aggregate Industries -WRC, Inc. (AI) regular <br />(112) operation reclamation permit application amendment to existing permit M-99-034. In <br />registering this objection, I wish to be notified and a part ofall future notices, meetings, hearings, <br />etc. regarding this permit application. As referenced in exhibit O of the applicant's application <br />document, I own property (identified as parcel I in exhibit C-1) directly adjacent to the northeast <br />boundary of Amendment No. 1 Atea. This property consisting of slightly over 4 acres of land <br />houses a residence, a storage barn, an outbuilding, and three water supply wells. This property has <br />been in my family for over 40 years. <br />My concerns and comments regarding the applicants proposed mining operation include: 1) <br />inconsistencies in the permit application documents, 2) injury to decreed water rights, 3) issues of <br />water quality, 4) lack of adequate slope stability evaluation, and 5) compliance with the Endangered <br />Species Act. On March 10, 2003, i met with Mike Refer of Aggregate Industries and Robort <br />Fleming of ADCO Consuhing at the property to further discuss the mining plan. At that time, I was <br />told that there had not been any additions, changes, or deletions to the application documents <br />(undated) provided to me. Therefore, I assume I have the current permit application document and <br />will comment on its content. <br />The residence structure and outbuilding on my property are located approxunately 40-feet east of the <br />Amendment No.l Area boundary. The storage bam is directly adjacent to the property boundary. <br />One bedrock aquifer well (permit no. 2455), pemtitted for domestic water supply, and one alluvial <br />aquifer well (permit no. 2456), permitted for {awn irrigation, are housed within the same vault <br />structure and located approximately 30-feet east of the property boundary. Our field irrigation well, <br />permit no. 32883, is an alluvial aquifer well that was adjudicated December 31, 1972. <br />Exhibit C-2, mining plan map, supports the mining plan documented in Exhibit D of the application. <br />In paragraph 3 of the mining notes and restrictions of Exhibit C-2 it is stated, "No dewatering will <br />occur, and below the water level, drag lines, backhoes, and/or dredges shall be employed for <br />mining." This statement is inconsistent with the text of paragraph 3 on page 2 of the permit <br />application document, which states, "fhe lakes may be partially dewatered, ...". My decreed <br />irrigation well is utilized tovrigate crops on the adjacent field. Given the proposed 35-feet setback <br />of adjacent property, this well will be approximately 65-feet from the active mining area. If the <br />