My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE27603
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE27603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:35:10 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/1/1983
Doc Name
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR NOV 83-41 PN 76-16 ENERGY 3
From
MLRD
To
COLORADO YAMPA COAL CO
Violation No.
CV1983041
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ <br />,~ <br /> <br />Justification for Proposed Settlement Agreemen[ of N.O.V. 83-41 <br />The facts of the violation were not contested by the operator. The staff <br />proposal for civil penalties was as follows: <br />Histor $ 0.00 <br />er~ness $875.00 <br />Negligence $750.00 <br />During the conference, several issues came to light which justify a change in <br />the proposed civil penalty. Seriousness had been based on the violation being <br />in existence substantially prior to our finding the company in violation. In <br />fact, the violation occurred as of September 15, 1983. Thus, the seriousness <br />should be adjusted to reflect this short timeframe. This short a timeframe, <br />in turn, affects the probability of damage occurrence, duration of potential <br />or actual damage, and extent of potential or actual damage. I am, therefore, <br />proposing a seriousness component of $200.00. <br />The fault component was proposed at the highest level within the negligence <br />Category. Evidence presented at the Assessment Conference indicates that the <br />company was making efforts to resolve the problem, but failed to do so within <br />the necessary timeframe. I am reducing the fault component to $650.00. <br />Based on the extremely rapid resolution of the violation and abatement <br />on-the-ground, a good faith component of $200.00 is justified. I am, <br />therefore, proposing a total civil penalty of $650.00. <br />/mt <br />Doc. No. 6695 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.