My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1979-06-22_ENFORCEMENT - M1978352
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1978352
>
1979-06-22_ENFORCEMENT - M1978352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 2:33:39 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:36:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978352
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/22/1979
Doc Name
REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS WILLIAM E NOTTINGHAM JR & NOTTINGHAM SAND & GRAVEL CO & MEMORANDUM BRIEF I
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
" (4) Any party adversely affected or ag- <br /> grieved by any agency action may commence an <br /> action for judicial review in the District <br /> Court . " Section 24-4-106 (4) , C. R.S. 1973 . <br /> (Emphasis supplied) . <br /> Thus the Administrative Procedure Act confers the <br /> right to seek judicial review only upon parties to the <br /> administrative proceeding. The term "party" is defined as <br /> follows: <br /> " (11) Party includes any person or <br /> agency named or admitted as a party, or pro- <br /> perly seeking and entitled as of right to be <br /> admitted as a party, in any court or agency <br /> proceeding subject to the provisions of this <br /> article. " Section 24-4-102 (11) , C.R.S. 1973. <br /> None of the Plaintiffs was ever named or admitted as a formal <br /> party to the licensing proceedings conducted at the March 1, <br /> 1979 Board meeting. The only parties to the licensing proceed- <br /> ing were the applicant, Nottingham Sand & Gravel Company, and <br /> the Mined Land Reclamation Board itself. Plaintiffs were only <br /> "interested persons" who participated informally in the li- <br /> censing proceeding. See, Rules and Regulations Rule 1 .23 <br /> and 1. 28. <br /> Plaintiffs could, of course, have sought to be <br /> admitted as a party to the administrative proceeding by <br /> submitting a request for an adjudicatory hearing. However , <br /> Plaintiffs never submitted such a request, thereby not only <br /> failing to exhaust their administrative remedies, but also <br /> ignoring an opportunity to obtain party status in the pro- <br /> ceeding. <br /> Throughout both the Administrative Procedure Act <br /> and the Rules and Regulations of the Board, there is consis- <br /> tently maintained a well defined distinction between the <br /> terms "interested person" and "party" . Thus, for example, <br /> the Rules and Regulations provide that "any interested person <br /> shall follow the procedures for objecting to permit applica- <br /> tions as set forth in Sections 2. 3 , 3. 3 and 4. 3 of these Rules <br /> and Regulations. " Rules and Regulations, Rule 1. 23 , (emphasis <br /> supplied) . Likewise, it is provided that "all meetings shall <br /> be open to the public and any interested person may appear <br /> -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.