My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-08_REVISION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
1988-04-08_REVISION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2021 8:01:57 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:36:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/8/1988
Doc Name
Submittal of TR-001 to revise bonding topsoil and diversion canal requirements
From
CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM CO
To
MLRB
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C~ <br />Henderson Mine Permit X77-342 <br />Technical Revision 414/88 <br />Page 2 <br />3. Soil Cover on Tailing <br /> <br />The Henderson Reclamation Plan (1977) states that the ultimate tailing <br />surface will be covered with 6-18 inches (12 inches average) depth of soil <br />and vegetated with grasses, shrubs, and trees. We installed a soil-tailing <br />test plot in September 1982 to observe the long-term effects that a <br />soil-on-tailing reclamation procedure may have on the vegetative cover <br />(Figure 1). <br />The plot consists of twenty-four ten by ten foot cells filled with six, <br />twelve, or eighteen inches of soil placed on three feet of tailing. The <br />cells are separated by timbers. All cells were seeded with the present <br />Climax seed mix at 50 pounds per acre and fertilized with 20-20-10 (N-P-K) <br />at the rate of 100 pounds per acre. <br />The plots have been in place for five growing seasons without any <br />maintenance, and our observations are that the vegetative cover is <br />~ 4~~~ sustained satisfactorily on either the six, twelve or eighteen inch soil <br />~' •~s depth. We therefore request that the requirement in the plan that the <br />1,^°1 ,, ultimate tailing surface be covered with 6-18 inches (12 inch average) <br />6~~ depth of soil be revised to 3-9 inches (6 inch average) depth of soil. <br />4. Soil Stockpile Plan <br />During the last five years Henderson has undergone some drastic <br />modifications to its operation which have resulted in fluctuating <br />production levels and subsequently fluctuating tailing deposition rates <br />and amounts. This year the projected rate of production was reduced to a <br />point where the present soil salvage and stockpile plan requires some <br />revisions. We wish to revise the soil stockpiling plan so it corresponds <br />with decreased mine production, decreased tailing deposition, and <br />d,l.-..~ decreased soil cover requirements. Because the smaller tailing pond <br />disturbs less land, more soil is available at a lower elevation for <br />reclamation. These factors allow a much simpler and lower-cost approach <br />to moving, storing, and replacing soil. In addition, construction costs <br />for the perimeter access road and interceptor canal are dramatically <br />reduced due to more favorable topography (i.e. not as steep). <br />4.1 Current Soil Stockpile Plan <br />Previously the tailing deposition area was to have occupied 1,551 <br />acres, reached the 8,900 foot contour on the upstream side of the <br />basin, and required 2.5 million cubic yards of soil to be placed on <br />the tailing to a depth of one foot at cessation of mining. Two <br />stockpile areas, one at the northwest and one at the southeast ends <br />of the tai_ting basin, were to have received 1.01 million cubic yards <br />each wile 0.47 mi'I1ion cubic yards have already been stockpiled <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.