My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE26725
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE26725
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:34:34 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:24:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/20/1996
Doc Name
SENECA II-W MINE NOV C-95-023
From
SENECA
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1995023
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Michael Long <br />May 16, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />Preliminary abatement options <br />(excerpt from letter to Susan Burgmaier, originally submitted November 1,1995) <br />For twelve months we were led to believe the postmine contours and drainage channels <br />were OK-based on the monthly DMG inspections. Suddenly they are not. We submitted <br />the Rill and Gully report noting that erosion occtured and stating we would put riprap in <br />this channel. We placed the riprap to minimize further erosion which proved successful, <br />Now it is not approved. Please consider vacating the violation because it is untimely and <br />poorly executed. <br />We agree that the existing conditions do not match the approved postmining topography <br />and drainage plan. However, the existing configuration will not have an adverse effect on <br />the hydrologic balance of this area. In order to abate the violation by constructing the <br />postmining topography and permanent drainage channels per the approved reclamation <br />plan, would result in a massive earthmoving project which would be detrimental to the <br />reclamation work already completed. Also, comments mentioned in the October and <br />November 1994 inspections state that the area reclaimed blends well with the surrounding <br />undisturbed topography. For abatement Seneca Coal Co. would rather submit a technical <br />revision addressing the postmining topography based on the existing conditions. <br />New drainage channel <br />The 006-NE-1 drainage channel, as shown on Exhibit 20-2, Post Mining Topography, <br />will be extended in a northeasterly direction from point J] approximately 2200 ft. The <br />006-NE-2 drainage channel will be moved to the southeast and the overall length <br />shortened by 100 ft. Both these drainages end in the exact junction where the post mine <br />plan states, at point BB or sedimentation pond 006. <br />Drainace channel statistics <br /> ~oroved Existin <br />006-NE-1 Post mine length 3500 R. 5700 ft. <br />Post mine upper elev. 7550 7685 <br />Post mine slope % 12.8 % 10.2 <br />006-NE-2 Post mine length 3350 ft. 3250 ft. <br />Post mine upper elev. 7700 7700 <br />Post mine slope % 14.3 % 14.8 <br />Noes: 1. For approved statistics see Exhibit 20-2 and Table 20-2 in Volume 13, Tab 20. <br />2. For existing statistics see the enclosed contour map dated 10-24-94. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.