2004-04-13_REVISION - M1985029 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

information is required before this can be completed. It appears that the proposed maximum disturbance may be too small since most of what is presently disturbed will likely remained disturbed even as mining progresses into the newly designated panels. By reviewing the plan it is not cleaz that any of the cusently disturbed azea can be reclaimed as the new panels are developed. Please review the total disturbed acreage and submit any corrections. Once these are received the reclamation costs will be calculated for the entire operation. 6.4.13 EXHIBIT M -Other Permits and Licenses Any comments that we have received from other agencies are enclosed with this letter. 6.4.14 EXHIBIT N -Source of Letal Rieht to Enter This section is adequate as submitted. 6.4.15 EXHIBIT O -Owner(s) of Record of Affected Land (Surface Area) and Owners of Substance to be Mined This section is adequate as submitted. 6.4.16 EXHIBIT P -Municipalities Within Two Miles Please provide the mailing address for the Town of Alma as required by Rule 6.4.16. 6.4.17 EXHIBIT Q -Proof of Mailine of Notices to County Commissioners and Soil Conservation District This section is adequate as submitted. 6.4.18 EXHIBIT R -Proof of Filine with County Clerk and Recorder This section is adequate as submitted. 6.4.19 EXHIBIT S -Permanent Man-Made Structures Rule 6.4.19 states- "Where the mining operation will adversely affect the stability of any significant structure located within 200 feet of the affected land, the applicant may either: (a) provide a notarized agreement between the applicant and the person(s) having an interest in the stmcture, that the applicant is to provide compensation for any damage to the structure; or (b) where such an agreement cannot be reached, the applicant shall provide an appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation.